28 Jun
2014
28 Jun
'14
7:39 p.m.
Hi alex
Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel?
- having the stable as a baseline is not nice because clients will cry
big times.
- there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to
manage it
and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out
it is importnt that people
can build on versions if they want.
Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail"
- unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can
clean it.
- versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel.
I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it.
Stef
29 Jun
29 Jun
2:14 a.m.
Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel?
Because Roassal1 has a feature to export view using Fuel. This was never really used
actually.
- having the stable as a baseline is not nice because
clients will cry big times.
- there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage it
and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is importnt
that people
can build on versions if they want.
Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail"
- unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it.
- versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel.
I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it.
Which version of Roassal are you referring to? Roassal 1 or 2?
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
7:02 a.m.
Stef means Roassal 1.
Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess
there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would
still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it
from the main Moose distribution.
Doru
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Why Roassal
depends on FuelMetalevel?
Because Roassal1 has a feature to export view using Fuel. This was never
really used actually.
- having the stable as a baseline is not nice
because clients will cry
big times.
- there is no correct version and it would be
good to use versionner to
manage it
and to release some versions from time to time.
Now that roassal2 is out
it is importnt that people
can build on versions if they want.
Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail"
- unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can
clean it.
- versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel.
I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it.
Which version of Roassal are you referring to? Roassal 1 or 2?
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3:23 p.m.
I will work on this then.
Alexandre
On Jun 29, 2014, at 1:02 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Stef means Roassal 1.
Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess there is quite
some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would still be nice to have a clean
version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it from the main Moose distribution.
Doru
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel?
Because Roassal1 has a feature to export view using Fuel. This was never really used
actually.
- having the stable as a baseline is not nice
because clients will cry big times.
- there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage it
and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is importnt
that people
can build on versions if they want.
Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail"
- unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it.
- versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel.
I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it.
Which version of Roassal are you referring to? Roassal 1 or 2?
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
30 Jun
30 Jun
10:39 a.m.
This is really simple. 2 min to fix.
I'm getting fast on that and I can do it.
Use Versionner it is cool.
Stef
On 29/6/14 15:23, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I will work on this then.
Alexandre
On Jun 29, 2014, at 1:02 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> Stef means Roassal 1.
>
> Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess there is
quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would still be nice to have a
clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it from the main Moose distribution.
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
wrote:
>> Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel?
> Because Roassal1 has a feature to export view using Fuel. This was never really used
actually.
>
>> - having the stable as a baseline is not nice because clients will cry big
times.
>> - there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage
it
>> and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is
importnt that people
>> can build on versions if they want.
>>
>> Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail"
>>
>> - unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it.
>>
>> - versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel.
>>
>> I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it.
> Which version of Roassal are you referring to? Roassal 1 or 2?
>
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:38 a.m.
Stef means Roassal 1.
Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I
guess there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so,
it would still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after
we remove it from the main Moose distribution.
This is really important to have Roassal1 fully working.
Stef
10:54 a.m.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:38 AM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
Stef means Roassal 1.
Are we not suppose to migrate all the projects using Roassal1 to Roassal2 ?
We did some with Anne few weeks ago but I do not have any news of that.
Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess
there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would
still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it
from the main Moose distribution.
This is really important to have Roassal1 fully working.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Cheers,
Leo Perard
University of Lille 1
11:20 a.m.
Yes, in the final Moose 5.0, we should end up with only Roassal2. However,
there exist external code that is based on Roassal 1 already, so Roassal 1
should remain clean and loadable separately.
Cheers,
Doru
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Leo Perard <leo.perard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:38 AM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Stef means Roassal 1.
Are we not suppose to migrate all the projects using Roassal1 to Roassal2 ?
We did some with Anne few weeks ago but I do not have any news of that.
Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess
there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would
still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it
from the main Moose distribution.
This is really important to have Roassal1 fully working.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Cheers,
Leo Perard
University of Lille 1
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
11:32 a.m.
Yes, in the final Moose 5.0, we should end up with
only Roassal2.
However, there exist external code that is based on Roassal 1 already,
so Roassal 1 should remain clean and loadable separately.
+1
Cheers,
Doru
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Leo Perard <leo.perard(a)gmail.com
<mailto:leo.perard@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:38 AM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr
<mailto:stepharo@free.fr>> wrote:
Stef means Roassal 1.
Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this
behavior. I guess there is quite some client code that
still uses Roassal 1, so, it would still be nice to have a
clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it from
the main Moose distribution.
This is really important to have Roassal1 fully working.
Are we not suppose to migrate all the projects using Roassal1 to
Roassal2 ?
We did some with Anne few weeks ago but I do not have any news of
that.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Cheers,
Leo Perard
University of Lille 1
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:22 a.m.
Alex
have a look at the configuration because it is not clean. I can fix it.
Re: [Moose-dev] Re: About
roassal2
Why Roassal
depends on FuelMetalevel?
Because Roassal1 has a feature to export view using Fuel.
This was never really used actually.
- having the stable as a baseline is not nice
because clients will cry big times.
- there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage it
and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is importnt
that people
can build on versions if they want.
Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail"
- unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it.
- versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel.
I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it.
Which
version of Roassal are you referring to? Roassal 1 or 2?
Alexandre
2 Jul
2 Jul
4 a.m.
Hi Stef,
You have now access to roassal 1
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 28, 2014, at 1:39 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
Hi alex
Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel?
- having the stable as a baseline is not nice because clients will cry big times.
- there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner to manage it
and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is out it is importnt
that people
can build on versions if they want.
Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail"
- unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can clean it.
- versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel.
I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:55 a.m.
ok I will have a look.
On 2/7/14 04:00, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi Stef,
You have now access to roassal 1
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 28, 2014, at 1:39 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr
<mailto:stepharo@free.fr>> wrote:
Hi alex
Why Roassal depends on FuelMetalevel?
- having the stable as a baseline is not nice because clients will
cry big times.
- there is no correct version and it would be good to use versionner
to manage it
and to release some versions from time to time. Now that roassal2 is
out it is importnt that people
can build on versions if they want.
Typically Synectiquers should really pay attention to this "detail"
- unique version is pure junk and looks like from a tutorial so I can
clean it.
- versionDevelopment: introduce a dependencies to FuelMetalevel.
I do not have access to it but I can clean it fast. Else I will fork it.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
11:18 a.m.
Ok I looked at it and Roassal1 was nearly ok.
I produced a new stable version with latest image versions including
all the packages (Athens and others).
Stef
3826
days inactive
3830
days old
12 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Leo Perard -
stepharo -
Tudor Girba