30 Jun
2014
30 Jun
'14
11:20 a.m.
Yes, in the final Moose 5.0, we should end up with only Roassal2. However,
there exist external code that is based on Roassal 1 already, so Roassal 1
should remain clean and loadable separately.
Cheers,
Doru
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Leo Perard <leo.perard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:38 AM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Stef means Roassal 1.
Are we not suppose to migrate all the projects using Roassal1 to Roassal2 ?
We did some with Anne few weeks ago but I do not have any news of that.
Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess
there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would
still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it
from the main Moose distribution.
This is really important to have Roassal1 fully working.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Cheers,
Leo Perard
University of Lille 1
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev