Yes, in the final Moose 5.0, we should end up with only Roassal2. However, there exist external code that is based on Roassal 1 already, so Roassal 1 should remain clean and loadable separately.
Cheers,Doru
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Leo Perard <leo.perard@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:38 AM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
This is really important to have Roassal1 fully working.
Stef means Roassal 1.
Exactly because Fuel was not used, we can remove this behavior. I guess there is quite some client code that still uses Roassal 1, so, it would still be nice to have a clean version of Roassal 1 even after we remove it from the main Moose distribution.
Are we not suppose to migrate all the projects using Roassal1 to Roassal2 ?We did some with Anne few weeks ago but I do not have any news of that.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Cheers,Leo PerardUniversity of Lille 1
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev