Moose-dev January 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

23 participants
129 discussions

Re: Issue 175 in moose-technology: Rename in Famix-Extensions "referenced/referencing" to "invoked/invoking"
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 01 Feb '11

01 Feb '11

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-4.2 Milestone-4.3 Comment #7 on issue 175 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Rename in Famix-Extensions "referenced/referencing" to "invoked/invoking" http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=175 This should go away when MooseChef is integrated. I would close it for now.

1 2

Re: Issue 57 in moose-technology: [FAMIX] code the LAN sample model in Java for reference and test
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 01 Feb '11

01 Feb '11

Updates: Cc: anquetil.nicolas Comment #5 on issue 57 by jannik.l...(a)gmail.com: [FAMIX] code the LAN sample model in Java for reference and test http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=57 (No comment was entered for this change.)

3 4

rpackage does not refresh on class rename
by Tudor Girba 31 Jan '11

31 Jan '11

Hi Cyrille, I noticed a case in which the RPackage did not seem to refresh after performing a class rename refactoring. I did not have a chance to write a test case for this, but I think it probably affects the importing as well. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."

2 1

Issue 512 in moose-technology: Implicit browsers should allow for extra transmissions
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 31 Jan '11

31 Jan '11

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Glamour New issue 512 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Implicit browsers should allow for extra transmissions http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=512 Currently, there is no way to create custom transmissions in an implicit browser. For example, it might be needed to capture a specific port and export it to outside. Another application is in providing a custom output for the status bar.

1 0

Re: Issue 315 in moose-technology: Moose Finder should be extensible by entities
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 31 Jan '11

31 Jan '11

Updates: Labels: Milestone-4.3 Comment #2 on issue 315 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Moose Finder should be extensible by entities http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=315 Currently, it is possible to extend the Moose Finder by defining extensions in the MooseFinder class. It's an Ok first solution but it will not really scale because we always have to test for the type. Instead, we should have a dynamic presentation computed by delegating to the objects.

1 1

Re: Issue 506 in moose-technology: Toolbar should be rendered on the top right
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 31 Jan '11

31 Jan '11

Updates: Summary: Toolbar should be rendered on the top right Comment #1 on issue 506 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Toolbar should be rendered on the top right http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=506 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 3

Issue 511 in moose-technology: Listing presentations should populate the status port
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 30 Jan '11

30 Jan '11

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Glamour New issue 511 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Listing presentations should populate the status port http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=511 The status port is used for displaying information on the statusbar, but currently only the Mondrian presentation offers this information.

1 0

follow moose
by Tudor Girba 30 Jan '11

30 Jan '11

Hi, If you want to follow Moose, you can do it via the following channels: - RSS feed: http://www.moosetechnology.org/news?view=PBEntriesRssView - Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/moosetechnologyorg/152851281427491 - Twitter: http://twitter.com/moosetechnology Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting is the right one."

1 0

Re: Issue 21 in moose-technology: Put author and timestamp in entity property
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 30 Jan '11

30 Jan '11

Updates: Summary: Put author and timestamp in entity property Comment #10 on issue 21 by simon.de...(a)gmail.com: Put author and timestamp in entity property http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=21 We quickly discussed that today, but I think it would be cool to add a switch in the importer telling whether or not we want to import such data - as well as a checkbox in the wizard. Should be easy enough. Also don't forget to meta-describe the properties (it would be cool if Fame could figure it does not need to save data which are nil)

1 4

what is the status of FameDB
by Stéphane Ducasse 29 Jan '11

29 Jan '11

Hi guys in the past marco did a bridge to database for metadescribed but since famix was not regular we could not get famix models in databases. So I would be interested to know if there is an ongoing effort to do that? Because this would be a real plus for FameDescribed models. May be using Glorp and I was thinking that this would be good also to get all the source code of pharo in a db using Ring. And get Torch there too. Stef

8 23

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
13
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev January 2011