2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

List overview
Download

Moose-dev January 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

23 participants
129 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Effort on increasing the test coverage

by Alexandre Bergel

Hi! We are looking for a case study for our work on test coverage. Moose (i.e., packages having their name beginning with 'Moose-') has all the characteristics of the ideal candidate. It is fairly large (399 classes and >3800 methods), it is important and has a relatively poor coverage. Only 52% of the method are executed by unit tests. For example, I was surprised that many methods of MooseModel are actually not executed by unit tests (e.g., inferNamespaceParentBasedOnNames, installDefaultModels). The LAN Example is never executed for example. Even DefaultStateEntity has many untested methods. This could very well be dead code. Is there a part that you would like us to focus on first? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

14 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

LinkedTabGroupMorph

by Tudor Girba

Hi Cyrille, I noticed that in the DistributionMap package we have a LinkedTabGroupMorph. However, this class is not referenced anywhere. Any idea what its goal is? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."

14 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

Re: about glamour

by Tudor Girba

Hi Alain, In the latest Glamour, you will have a light color for no empty panes. Cheers, Doru On 15 Jan 2011, at 18:38, Alain Plantec wrote: > Le 15/01/2011 18:23, Tudor Girba a écrit : >> Well, those panes are actually drawn, only the renderer draws them with transparent color. >> >> You could show an empty text there: >> browser transmit to: #below; andShow: [:a | a text display: '']. >> >> However, this is a bit against the idea of Glamour which is to show data. Here, you would show something only because of the visual appearance. > yes, I agree with you but you could make the panes with "no data" rendered with a darker color (very light gray fro example). > So the user would have a clear idea of how is composed the browser. Having blank areas is uncomfortable to me. > > btw, how is it possible to update the browser when a part of it is changed ? > Thanks > Alain > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Problem solving efficiency grows with the abstractness level of problem understanding."

14 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

Andre Hora wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn

by Andre Hora

LinkedIn ------------ Moose-related, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Andre Hora Andre Hora Software Engineer at INRIA Lille Nord Europe - RMod team at INRIA Lille Area, France Confirm that you know Andre Hora https://www.linkedin.com/e/-hlc47i-gj9cetfn-1p/isd/2192800060/c2iF1T9u/ -- (c) 2010, LinkedIn Corporation

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: Issue 145 in moose-technology: check #flag: senders

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -Milestone-4.2 Milestone-4.3 Comment #16 on issue 145 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: check #flag: senders http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=145 This issue is too wide to ever get closed. We should create more specific issues if needed.

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: Issue 407 in moose-technology: export a javaProject imported with inFusion does not work

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Milestone-4.3 Comment #2 on issue 407 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: export a javaProject imported with inFusion does not work http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=407 This was fixed a while ago.

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: Issue 430 in moose-technology: [Glamour][Mondrian] increase/decrease zooming

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Milestone-4.3 Component-Glamour Comment #1 on issue 430 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: [Glamour][Mondrian] increase/decrease zooming http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=430 Take a look at MOViewRenderer>>openWithStatusbar

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: Issue 444 in moose-technology: Zoom buttons not available in class blueprint

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Milestone-4.3 Comment #1 on issue 444 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Zoom buttons not available in class blueprint http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=444 (No comment was entered for this change.)

14 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Issue 496 in moose-technology: bug when opening system complexity : MOTreeLayout(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #topGap:

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Famix New issue 496 by cy.delau...(a)gmail.com: bug when opening system complexity : MOTreeLayout(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #topGap: http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=496 In the latest moose dev image: http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/lastSuccessfulBuild/… If you create a model and try to visualize system complexity from all classes, an error will be thrown: MOTreeLayout(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #topGap: I guess it is due to some modifications in mondrian and that the code of system complexity has not been updated.

14 years, 3 months

1
4
0 0

extension method should reference own class ?

by Nicolas Anquetil

I believe a package with an extension method should be seen as depending on the package owning the extended class (and also depending on the extended class) Right now, this is not implemented in the various {sure|potential}ReferencedPackage , {sure|potential}ReferencedClass After discussing with Simon, we believe that this would at least call for an explicit representation of the extension as an association. This would go in Famix-Smalltalk The question maybe how to represent this? Simon sees it as an association between a package and a method: Me (package) defines an extension (the method) I was rather thinking of a class/method association: Me (class) am extended by you (method) and the reverse: me (method) extends you (class) then of course we would need to implement the query system on top of this ... what do you people think about this? nicolas

14 years, 3 months

4
7
0 0

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Older →