On 28 sept. 2010, at 22:51, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Great, now it's all fine:
> http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/
>
> I just had to fix a missing refactoring in Famix-Extensions.
Good, apparently I was a bit careless with the refactoring in Ma Graph (well the image hung up, I had to restart and probably forgot to commit)
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 28 Sep 2010, at 21:46, Simon Denier wrote:
>
>>
>> On 28 sept. 2010, at 20:57, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just tried creating a new image, but there is a problem with traits definition:
>>> http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/370/console
>>>
>>> Could you take a look?
>>
>>
>> Re-argh, same problem, renaming a trait does not make a package dirty by default, and I didn't check for external users of traits (now I know how to do that :()
>> Fixed in Famix-Extensions and DSM.
>>
>> Can you try again?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28 Sep 2010, at 17:20, Simon Denier wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's done. Squeaksource was down a bit this afternoon, and Lukas's server seems down since this morning, so I can't test a load default now, but hopefully everything is alright now. We will see tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28 sept. 2010, at 13:01, Simon Denier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28 sept. 2010, at 09:11, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like while renaming you missed to publish some packages: MOTarjanNodeDSM still seems to inherit from the old MOTarjanNode, and because of that the build breaks :).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Argh, never thought I could still be bitten by the non-dirty package bug in MC :(
>>>>>
>>>>> So changing a superclass does not make a package dirty mmm... I guess I will to check with Package Blueprints what's the impact of renaming classes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the prefix, I will take Mal, just because fireflies do not bite (...)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Doru
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 Sep 2010, at 22:00, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These classes should be called MAlgo (or MAL ?). I started to do that a while ago, but apparently I forgot to commit this change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Doru
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 27 Sep 2010, at 19:42, Simon Denier wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 27 sept. 2010, at 18:17, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please note that the MA* (with an uppercase $A) prefix is already
>>>>>>>>> taken by Magritte. Ma* (with a lowercase $a) is taken by Magma, if I
>>>>>>>>> remember correctly they renamed their classes at some point a long
>>>>>>>>> time ago to avoid the conflict with Magritte.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ok, one issue is that all classes in Moose-Algos (not only Moose-Algos-Graph) are prefixed with MA so we will need to change that...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but at least now there is some consistency in class names.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 27 September 2010 17:51, Simon Denier <Simon.Denier(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I just performed a mass class renaming in Moose Algos Graph. Some classes still had the old prefix MO*, they now all have a MA* prefix. Class references in default Moose have been updated too (this includes DSM...)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, if you use Moose-Algos-Graph and your package is not part of Moose default, you might to take a look and see if you need to update some references.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also, the API of MAGraphAlgorithm has been extracted into trait MATGraphBuilder if someone wants to reuse it in a different setting (as requested). I don't support nested graph for now though, as it is not clear for me the best way to build them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Lukas Renggli
>>>>>>>>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Simon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>
>>> "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Problem solving efficiency grows with the abstractness level of problem understanding."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
On 28 sept. 2010, at 20:57, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried creating a new image, but there is a problem with traits definition:
> http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/370/console
>
> Could you take a look?
Re-argh, same problem, renaming a trait does not make a package dirty by default, and I didn't check for external users of traits (now I know how to do that :()
Fixed in Famix-Extensions and DSM.
Can you try again?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 28 Sep 2010, at 17:20, Simon Denier wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> It's done. Squeaksource was down a bit this afternoon, and Lukas's server seems down since this morning, so I can't test a load default now, but hopefully everything is alright now. We will see tomorrow.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28 sept. 2010, at 13:01, Simon Denier wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 28 sept. 2010, at 09:11, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like while renaming you missed to publish some packages: MOTarjanNodeDSM still seems to inherit from the old MOTarjanNode, and because of that the build breaks :).
>>>
>>>
>>> Argh, never thought I could still be bitten by the non-dirty package bug in MC :(
>>>
>>> So changing a superclass does not make a package dirty mmm... I guess I will to check with Package Blueprints what's the impact of renaming classes.
>>>
>>>
>>> As for the prefix, I will take Mal, just because fireflies do not bite (...)
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Doru
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27 Sep 2010, at 22:00, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>
>>>>> These classes should be called MAlgo (or MAL ?). I started to do that a while ago, but apparently I forgot to commit this change.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Doru
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27 Sep 2010, at 19:42, Simon Denier wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 sept. 2010, at 18:17, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please note that the MA* (with an uppercase $A) prefix is already
>>>>>>> taken by Magritte. Ma* (with a lowercase $a) is taken by Magma, if I
>>>>>>> remember correctly they renamed their classes at some point a long
>>>>>>> time ago to avoid the conflict with Magritte.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ok, one issue is that all classes in Moose-Algos (not only Moose-Algos-Graph) are prefixed with MA so we will need to change that...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but at least now there is some consistency in class names.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 27 September 2010 17:51, Simon Denier <Simon.Denier(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I just performed a mass class renaming in Moose Algos Graph. Some classes still had the old prefix MO*, they now all have a MA* prefix. Class references in default Moose have been updated too (this includes DSM...)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, if you use Moose-Algos-Graph and your package is not part of Moose default, you might to take a look and see if you need to update some references.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, the API of MAGraphAlgorithm has been extracted into trait MATGraphBuilder if someone wants to reuse it in a different setting (as requested). I don't support nested graph for now though, as it is not clear for me the best way to build them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Lukas Renggli
>>>>>>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>>
>>>>> "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>
>>>> "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
It's done. Squeaksource was down a bit this afternoon, and Lukas's server seems down since this morning, so I can't test a load default now, but hopefully everything is alright now. We will see tomorrow.
On 28 sept. 2010, at 13:01, Simon Denier wrote:
>
> On 28 sept. 2010, at 09:11, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> It looks like while renaming you missed to publish some packages: MOTarjanNodeDSM still seems to inherit from the old MOTarjanNode, and because of that the build breaks :).
>
>
> Argh, never thought I could still be bitten by the non-dirty package bug in MC :(
>
> So changing a superclass does not make a package dirty mmm... I guess I will to check with Package Blueprints what's the impact of renaming classes.
>
>
> As for the prefix, I will take Mal, just because fireflies do not bite (...)
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On 27 Sep 2010, at 22:00, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> These classes should be called MAlgo (or MAL ?). I started to do that a while ago, but apparently I forgot to commit this change.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 Sep 2010, at 19:42, Simon Denier wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27 sept. 2010, at 18:17, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please note that the MA* (with an uppercase $A) prefix is already
>>>>> taken by Magritte. Ma* (with a lowercase $a) is taken by Magma, if I
>>>>> remember correctly they renamed their classes at some point a long
>>>>> time ago to avoid the conflict with Magritte.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ok, one issue is that all classes in Moose-Algos (not only Moose-Algos-Graph) are prefixed with MA so we will need to change that...
>>>>
>>>> but at least now there is some consistency in class names.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lukas
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27 September 2010 17:51, Simon Denier <Simon.Denier(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>>>>> I just performed a mass class renaming in Moose Algos Graph. Some classes still had the old prefix MO*, they now all have a MA* prefix. Class references in default Moose have been updated too (this includes DSM...)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, if you use Moose-Algos-Graph and your package is not part of Moose default, you might to take a look and see if you need to update some references.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, the API of MAGraphAlgorithm has been extracted into trait MATGraphBuilder if someone wants to reuse it in a different setting (as requested). I don't support nested graph for now though, as it is not clear for me the best way to build them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Lukas Renggli
>>>>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>
>>> "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."
>>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
>
--
Simon
On 28 sept. 2010, at 15:16, Guillermo Schwarz wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Why don't you do something more focused on the long term and don't you change the Smalltalk compiler with namespaces?
As you said, it's something for long-term....
Meanwhile, I'm just putting some pressure on our daily tools (Moose + OR) and it's also good :)
>
> I don't think it should be that hard since each class already belongs to a category. Each category could instead be a dictionary from where the compiler could find classes that are mentioned in the class source.
>
> This has worked wonders in Java (classes inside packages). This way classes' names can be repeated ad eternum without generating collisions or otherwise polluting excessively the name space.
>
> So for example:
>
> FAMIXAssociation subclass: #FAMIXInvocation
> instanceVariableNames: 'sender receiver receiverSourceCode signature candidates'
> classVariableNames: ''
> poolDictionaries: ''
> category: 'Famix-Core'
>
> Would be instead:
>
> Association subclass: #Invocation
> instanceVariableNames: 'sender receiver receiverSourceCode signature candidates'
> classVariableNames: ''
> poolDictionaries: ''
> category: #FamixCore
>
> Then the category would be an index in the SystemDictionary:
>
> SystemDictionary at: #FamixCore put: Category new.
>
> (SystemDictionary at: #FamixCore) belongingClassList add: #Invocation "this should be done automatically by the subclass: method above"
>
> (SystemDictionary at: #FamixCore) referencedClassList add: ... "classes that are referenced by classes belonging to category #FamixCore"
>
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
> Guillermo.
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:00:33 +0200
> From: Tudor Girba <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: Class renaming in Moose Algos Graph
> To: Moose-related development <moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch>
> Message-ID: <C912A83B-6BDC-4775-AC26-CE2DBC5540AE(a)gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> These classes should be called MAlgo (or MAL ?). I started to do that a while ago, but apparently I forgot to commit this change.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 27 Sep 2010, at 19:42, Simon Denier wrote:
>
> >
> > On 27 sept. 2010, at 18:17, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> >
> >> Please note that the MA* (with an uppercase $A) prefix is already
> >> taken by Magritte. Ma* (with a lowercase $a) is taken by Magma, if I
> >> remember correctly they renamed their classes at some point a long
> >> time ago to avoid the conflict with Magritte.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
Hi,
I moved all code from Moose-MondrianScripts to Moose-
MondrianPaintings, and I removed the Moose-MondrianScripts from the
configuration.
I would like to work slowly on package restructuring. In the
following, I would like to rename the test packages:
Moose-LAN -> Moose-TestResources-LAN
Famix-LANTests -> Moose-Tests-SmalltalkImporter-LAN
MooseKGB-TestFamix3 -> Moose-Tests-KGB
Moose-KGB-* -> Moose-TestResources-KGB-*
Moose-SmalltalkImporterTests -> Moose-Tests-SmalltalkImporter
Moose-Test-PackageOne -> Moose-TestResources-Reference-PackageOne
Moose-Test-PackageTwo -> Moose-TestResources-Reference-PackageTwo
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."
On 28 sept. 2010, at 13:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> As for the prefix, I will take Mal, just because fireflies do not bite (...)
>
> Great, although I am not sure I understand the word play :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Reynolds
Hehe, I hope some people in the wave got it pretty easily :D
--
Simon
On 28 sept. 2010, at 09:11, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> It looks like while renaming you missed to publish some packages: MOTarjanNodeDSM still seems to inherit from the old MOTarjanNode, and because of that the build breaks :).
Argh, never thought I could still be bitten by the non-dirty package bug in MC :(
So changing a superclass does not make a package dirty mmm... I guess I will to check with Package Blueprints what's the impact of renaming classes.
As for the prefix, I will take Mal, just because fireflies do not bite (...)
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 27 Sep 2010, at 22:00, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> These classes should be called MAlgo (or MAL ?). I started to do that a while ago, but apparently I forgot to commit this change.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On 27 Sep 2010, at 19:42, Simon Denier wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 27 sept. 2010, at 18:17, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please note that the MA* (with an uppercase $A) prefix is already
>>>> taken by Magritte. Ma* (with a lowercase $a) is taken by Magma, if I
>>>> remember correctly they renamed their classes at some point a long
>>>> time ago to avoid the conflict with Magritte.
>>>
>>>
>>> ok, one issue is that all classes in Moose-Algos (not only Moose-Algos-Graph) are prefixed with MA so we will need to change that...
>>>
>>> but at least now there is some consistency in class names.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lukas
>>>>
>>>> On 27 September 2010 17:51, Simon Denier <Simon.Denier(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>>>>> I just performed a mass class renaming in Moose Algos Graph. Some classes still had the old prefix MO*, they now all have a MA* prefix. Class references in default Moose have been updated too (this includes DSM...)
>>>>>
>>>>> So, if you use Moose-Algos-Graph and your package is not part of Moose default, you might to take a look and see if you need to update some references.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, the API of MAGraphAlgorithm has been extracted into trait MATGraphBuilder if someone wants to reuse it in a different setting (as requested). I don't support nested graph for now though, as it is not clear for me the best way to build them.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Simon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lukas Renggli
>>>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
On 27 sept. 2010, at 18:17, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> Please note that the MA* (with an uppercase $A) prefix is already
> taken by Magritte. Ma* (with a lowercase $a) is taken by Magma, if I
> remember correctly they renamed their classes at some point a long
> time ago to avoid the conflict with Magritte.
ok, one issue is that all classes in Moose-Algos (not only Moose-Algos-Graph) are prefixed with MA so we will need to change that...
but at least now there is some consistency in class names.
>
> Lukas
>
> On 27 September 2010 17:51, Simon Denier <Simon.Denier(a)inria.fr> wrote:
>> I just performed a mass class renaming in Moose Algos Graph. Some classes still had the old prefix MO*, they now all have a MA* prefix. Class references in default Moose have been updated too (this includes DSM...)
>>
>> So, if you use Moose-Algos-Graph and your package is not part of Moose default, you might to take a look and see if you need to update some references.
>>
>>
>> Also, the API of MAGraphAlgorithm has been extracted into trait MATGraphBuilder if someone wants to reuse it in a different setting (as requested). I don't support nested graph for now though, as it is not clear for me the best way to build them.
>>
>> --
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
On 27 sept. 2010, at 12:04, Tudor Girba wrote:
> If you use the GLMUITheme, you will see a nice down arrow.
Yes but :)
1) I don't like the Glamorous theme, sorry
2) and I still think it does not work, as the arrow is at the level of the window buttons, not at the toolbar level for actions - so it's not a place someone would go easily to look for actions.
>
> Doru
>
>
>
> On 27 Sep 2010, at 11:47, Simon Denier wrote:
>
>>
>> On 27 sept. 2010, at 11:21, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Indeed, I forgot to announce that. The textual menu was moved in the window menu (the icon on the top right).
>>
>>
>> ah ok :)
>>
>> I never use that menu, and I'm not sure other people takes a look at it. Actually I have a different expectation for this bytton: its common behaviour on MacOs is to hide/show the toolbar. So is it a wise choice?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 Sep 2010, at 11:01, Simon Denier wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> With the latest update of Glamour, I don't have anymore the toolbar menu entitled '...' with the iconless actions. (in MoosePanel and the MetaBrowser)
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I didn't have time to check deeper.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>
>>> "There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow."
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
Hi,
We are happy to announce the first version of Glamour on Seaside. This work was carried out by Andrei Vasile Chis and was sponsored by ESUG. The project offers a Seaside-based rendering of Glamour browsers. In other words, once you have a browser in Glamour, you can now simply display it on the web.
You can obtain the code in two ways:
- Nightly built image:
http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-with-glamour-seaside/lastSucces…
- Metacello configuration loadable in Pharo 1.1 (not Core)
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'Glamour';
package: 'ConfigurationOfGlamourSeaside';
load.
(Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfGlamourSeaside) loadDefault.
A couple of examples are available on the Moose server:
http://online.moosetechnology.org/glamour/basicExamples (a number of example browsers)
http://online.moosetechnology.org/moose/metaBrowser (a browser for the meta-model of Moose)
Several developments are planned for the near future, so stay tuned for more news.
We would highly appreciate any kind of feedback.
Cheers,
Andrei and Doru
