16 Mar
2010
16 Mar
'10
11:51 a.m.
Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks like it loads some
old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
--
Simon
16 Mar
16 Mar
11:53 a.m.
Hi,
Where can I get an RC3 from?
Cheers,
Doru
On 16 Mar 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:
Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks
like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
1:34 p.m.
I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed (loadDefault does
not seem to do the job).
But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks
like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
12:52 p.m.
On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed
(loadDefault does not seem to do the job).
But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got loaded, including the one
with a wrong recursive behavior which launch an infinite loop.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks like it loads some
old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:37 p.m.
Simon, do you know which test I should exclude?
I am currently conducting an experiment on Moose unit test, and the
deadline is approaching. Naturally, I could use an old version of
Moose, but I do not think this is the idea.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 07:52, Simon Denier wrote:
On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed
(loadDefault does
not seem to do the job).
But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got loaded,
including the one with a wrong recursive behavior which launch an
infinite loop.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it
looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
8:45 p.m.
If it's moose algos, than just load the latest version manually.
Doru
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2010, at 21:37, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre(a)bergel.eu> wrote:
Simon, do you know which test I should exclude?
I am currently conducting an experiment on Moose unit test, and the
deadline is approaching. Naturally, I could use an old version of
Moose, but I do not think this is the idea.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 07:52, Simon Denier wrote:
On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed
(loadDefault
does not seem to do the job).
But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got
loaded, including the one with a wrong recursive behavior which
launch an infinite loop.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it
looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform
loadDefault.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
17 Mar
17 Mar
midnight
If you load the latest packages of MooseAlgos, you should not have any problem.
On 16 mars 2010, at 21:37, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Simon, do you know which test I should exclude?
I am currently conducting an experiment on Moose unit test, and the deadline is
approaching. Naturally, I could use an old version of Moose, but I do not think this is
the idea.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 07:52, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed
(loadDefault does not seem to do the job).
But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got loaded, including the
one with a wrong recursive behavior which launch an infinite loop.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks like it loads some
old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
23 Mar
23 Mar
9:58 p.m.
True.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 19:00, Simon Denier wrote:
If you load the latest packages of MooseAlgos, you should not have
any problem.
On 16 mars 2010, at 21:37, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Simon, do you know which test I should exclude?
I am currently conducting an experiment on Moose unit test, and the
deadline is approaching. Naturally, I could use an old version of
Moose, but I do not think this is the idea.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 07:52, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed
(loadDefault
does not seem to do the job).
But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got
loaded, including the one with a wrong recursive behavior which
launch an infinite loop.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
>
> Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
>
> I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it
> looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform
> loadDefault.
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
17 Mar
17 Mar
11:22 a.m.
I managed to load default Moose in 10508 without problem. But in RC3, default Moose loads
older packages. Could it be that the version of Metacello is different? A problem with
recursive projects?
I have in 10508 ~1.0-beta.21 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
and in 10515 >=1.0-beta.24 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
On 16 mars 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:
Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks like it loads some
old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
--
Simon
--
Simon
5:32 p.m.
Simon,
I'll take a look this morning and see what's up ...
Dale
----- "Simon Denier" <Simon.Denier(a)inria.fr> wrote:
| I managed to load default Moose in 10508 without problem. But in RC3,
| default Moose loads older packages. Could it be that the version of
| Metacello is different? A problem with recursive projects?
|
| I have in 10508 ~1.0-beta.21 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
| and in 10515 >=1.0-beta.24 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
|
|
| On 16 mars 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:
|
| >
| > Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
| >
| > I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks
| like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
| >
| > --
| > Simon
| >
| >
| >
|
| --
| Simon
7:46 p.m.
Simon,
This is indeed a bug in 1.0-beta.24. I expect to have a bugfix today and will release
1.0-beta.24.1 when it's ready ... Good catch.
Dale
----- "Simon Denier" <Simon.Denier(a)inria.fr> wrote:
| I managed to load default Moose in 10508 without problem. But in RC3,
| default Moose loads older packages. Could it be that the version of
| Metacello is different? A problem with recursive projects?
|
| I have in 10508 ~1.0-beta.21 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
| and in 10515 >=1.0-beta.24 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
|
|
| On 16 mars 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:
|
| >
| > Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
| >
| > I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks
| like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
| >
| > --
| > Simon
| >
| >
| >
|
| --
| Simon
8:04 p.m.
Submited Issue 66 (http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=66) to cover the
prboblem.
Dale
----- "Dale Henrichs" <dale.henrichs(a)gemstone.com> wrote:
| Simon,
|
| This is indeed a bug in 1.0-beta.24. I expect to have a bugfix today
| and will release 1.0-beta.24.1 when it's ready ... Good catch.
|
| Dale
| ----- "Simon Denier" <Simon.Denier(a)inria.fr> wrote:
|
| | I managed to load default Moose in 10508 without problem. But in
| RC3,
| | default Moose loads older packages. Could it be that the version of
| | Metacello is different? A problem with recursive projects?
| |
| | I have in 10508 ~1.0-beta.21 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
| | and in 10515 >=1.0-beta.24 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
| |
| |
| | On 16 mars 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:
| |
| | >
| | > Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
| | >
| | > I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it
| looks
| | like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
| | >
| | > --
| | > Simon
| | >
| | >
| | >
| |
| | --
| | Simon
5149
days inactive
5156
days old
11 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Dale Henrichs -
Simon Denier -
Tudor Girba