Thanks, Alex.
It works.
Cheers,
Doru
On 26 Jun 2010, at 00:11, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
The problem is fixed. Version 481 contains a test that shows the
problem and a fix for it.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 25 Jun 2010, at 07:11, Laval Jannik wrote:
> Hi Doru,
> I confirm the problem.
> I tried to use blueprint yesterday, without success.
>
> Cheers,
> Jannik
>
> On Jun 25, 2010, at 00:20 , Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the recent changes in Mondrian it looks like the class
>> blueprint is broken. The problem seems to be due to incorrect
>> bounds of the parent node. I noticed when by spawning the
>> blueprint of a hierarchy of classes, I got overlapping classes.
>>
>> I will take a closer look, but it would be great if someone could
>> confirm this problem. I guess it should happen with other nested
>> visualizations.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> --
>>
www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> ---
> Jannik Laval
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev