Fine for me!
I see several efforts in Moose. What is the big plan?
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On May 31, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Cyril Ferlicot D.
<cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to talk about something I would love to see in Moose: a
Mock framework.
I love to have a stable structure so I love tests. But sometimes it is
hard to produce tests for Famix because the models are complex and I
want to test a specific, simple, case. I think that as a code quality
analysis platform, Moose *needs* to get a Mock framework.
Thus I would like to add Mocketry to the dependencies of Famix or Fame.
Why Mocketry? Because we already have some of its dependencies in the
dependencies of Famix and because I find it easier to use than BabyMock.
So... Do someone has objections? Do someone think we need a Mock
framework but thinks that Mocketry is not the right one?
If I have no objection I'll add the dependency then some more tests :)
--
Cyril Ferlicot
https://ferlicot.fr
http://www.synectique.eu
2 rue Jacques Prévert 01,
59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev