[Moose-dev] Re: Integrating Mocketry

-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > On May 31, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Cyril Ferlicot D. cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I would like to talk about something I would love to see in Moose: a > Mock framework. > > I love to have a stable structure so I love tests. But sometimes it is > hard to produce tests for Famix because the models are complex and I > want to test a specific, simple, case. I think that as a code quality > analysis platform, Moose *needs* to get a Mock framework. > > Thus I would like to add Mocketry to the dependencies of Famix or Fame. > > Why Mocketry? Because we already have some of its dependencies in the > dependencies of Famix and because I find it easier to use than BabyMock. > > So... Do someone has objections? Do someone think we need a Mock > framework but thinks that Mocketry is not the right one? > > If I have no objection I'll add the dependency then some more tests :) > > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr > > http://www.synectique.eu > 2 rue Jacques Prévert 01, > 59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev