Fine for me!

I see several efforts in Moose. What is the big plan?

Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On May 31, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello everyone,

I would like to talk about something I would love to see in Moose: a
Mock framework.

I love to have a stable structure so I love tests. But sometimes it is
hard to produce tests for Famix because the models are complex and I
want to test a specific, simple, case. I think that as a code quality
analysis platform, Moose *needs* to get a Mock framework.

Thus I would like to add Mocketry to the dependencies of Famix or Fame.

Why Mocketry? Because we already have some of its dependencies in the
dependencies of Famix and because I find it easier to use than BabyMock.

So... Do someone has objections? Do someone think we need a Mock
framework but thinks that Mocketry is not the right one?

If I have no objection I'll add the dependency then some more tests :)

--
Cyril Ferlicot
https://ferlicot.fr

http://www.synectique.eu
2 rue Jacques Prévert 01,
59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev