9 Sep
2014
9 Sep
'14
4:25 p.m.
We certainly should consider this direction. Another direction is simply
using SVG. One thing is certain: we have to move away from bitmaps :)
Doru
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, [CH] Aliaksei Syrel <alex(a)syrel.ch> wrote:
Hi,
What if we transform icon pack into iconic font, of cource if such technic
is supported by pharo? In this case the color of icons could be customised
by themes.
Cheers,
Alex
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:09 AM, phil(a)highoctane.be <phil(a)highoctane.be wrote:
Maybe we need a new set of icons based on a different color set?
You can find the current ones here: https://github.com/girba/mooseart
Andrei
> Also I am using the DawnTheme here.
> Phil
> Phil
> > > > Andrei
> > > > >
> > >> Phil
> >> > >> > Cheers,
> >> > Andrei
> >> > >> > > >> >> All the best,
> >> > > >> >>
Phil
> >> > > >> > > >> >>
_______________________________________________
> >> >> Moose-dev mailing list
> >> >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> >> >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >> > > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Moose-dev mailing list
> >> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> >> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >> > > > >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Moose-dev mailing list
> >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Le 9 sept. 2014 00:21, "Andrei Chis" <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Le 8 sept. 2014 23:28,
"Andrei Chis" <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
> > > Hi Phil,
> > > Thanks for your feedback :)
> > Workspace has a large API. At the moment in the Playground we only
implemented the minimum.
Sweet.
> BTW is there a version which works
well with the dark theme? As you can see from the screenshot things are hard to
read. Uko maybe has
something?
Aha. So you have a different use case than us. Let me know if you run into
any problem with Glamour/GT
The icons should be aware of the theme.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:46 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be <phil(a)highoctane.be>
wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:36 AM, phil(a)highoctane.be <
phil(a)highoctane.be> wrote:
> >
> >> When one is in Monticello (Pharo 3.0) and asks for "View Past
Comments" on a package, there is a #mnu on GTPlayground
class>>openLabel:
> >
> >> Not only there but the FileList (aka FileBrowser) has that
"Workspace with contents" command which is broken in the same way.
> >
> >> There is for sure an interesting equivalent in GTPlayground. Why
not name it as the Workspace thing?
> >
> >> What is asked:
> > > >> edit: aText label:
labelString accept: anAction
> >> "Open an editor on the given string/text"
> > > >> ^(Smalltalk tools
workspace openLabel: labelString)
> >> acceptContents: aText;
> >> acceptAction: anAction;
> >> yourself.
> > > >> What GTPlayground
implements:
> > > >> openContents:
> >> openContents:label:
> > > >> We can deal with
openLabel: and acceptContents but an acceptAction
equivalent is not to be found.
> >
> >> Also, after looking around (see changeset in attachment), it is
hard to do the acceptContents: as we get a self new openOn: page which
isn't returning anything I can work with to chain acceptContents: to.
> >
> >> What to do there?
> > > > For the moment in the implementation of acceptContents:
and
acceptAction: from GLMSystemWindow I delegate to the model, which is
GTPlayground.
> > acceptContents: can be easily
implemented this way but
acceptAction: it's a little more problematic. I need
to look more at how it
behaves in Workspace but from what I've see we can get the same behaviour
if when calling acceptAction: I set the given action to be executed on cmd+s
>
> > > > > >> Also, there is a super annoying
thing in the GTPlayground, namely
the disappearance of the top right menu, with all
the interesting options
that are in there and that I do use all the time (like open/save, previous
contents, ...). What's the point of a Playground if I can't save my plays?
I think I am missing something here.
>
> > > This features are just
not implemented yet.
> > We were thinking of a more general and automatic way of saving the
content of the workspace but did't manage to implemented yet.
> > For the previous content you have access
to the entire history of
the workspace. Do you find it intuitive?
> > What other actions from the top down
menu are missing for you?
> > > > >
> > >> I now have to go back to
the old Workspace for the default.
> > > >> It may be good to
have a way to have the playground as a specific
menu entry.
> >
> >> I've started using the ZnWorkspace and as it extends the
Workspace,
its features aren't picked up in GTPlayground of course.
> >> Now, it may be great to include
those Pastebin style things into
GTPlayground so that we can all play together from
little urls from Twitter
posts.
>
> > > I'll have a look
at ZnWorkspace. Did't use it yet :)
> > > I also integrated your
changeset.
> > If want to fix more bugs in the future feel free to commit directly
in
the Moose repository.
> I
can add you as a contributor if you're not one already.
I am not. Add me please.
Done :) I would be pleased to be of help with GToolkit.
Any help is welcomed :)
Not that I know of. The main problem is that Moose is still in Pharo 3
where the
black theme is still a "hack", so not every setting can be
properly customised. But the move to Phato 4 should happen soon, and then
things should improve.
Mmh. I am using 3.0 for customer projects. So I'll have a look into that
as I want to use the GT things to see how well the playground can help with
exploration of options.