13 Mar
2014
13 Mar
'14
1:51 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
Hi!
The Moose image offers much more than offering moose. For example, I have a postdoc
working on Astronomy images and she is using the moose image not because of moose, but
because of what is shipped with it.
Interesting, whayt kind of stuff she is doing with the MOOSE image ?
Does something who is not interested in analyzing
software may find the moose image useful? The answer is absolutely yes.
What about changing the name of the Moose image into something closer to what it really
offer?
Maybe Pharo4Modelling ? PharoModellingEdition?
I think this discussion is important.
I also try to push more and more MOOSE as a modelling platform.
Yes Pharo4Modelling is maybe a good name.
Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/