I am happy to announce that thanks to the very valuable help of Doru, the bug has been
clearly identified and subsequently removed. nicolas ----- Mail original -----
De: "Tudor Girba" <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
À: "Moose-related development" <moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch>
Envoyé: Mercredi 19 Octobre 2011 14:53:41
Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 728 in moose-technology: VerveineJ places
methods in the wrong classes
I am looking into it right now. Actually, I think the issue is related
to a larger context that I do not see clearly at this moment.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <
nicolas.anquetil(a)inria.fr > wrote:
> can't you rename all things
> C1, C2, C3, ...
> m1, m2, m3, ...
> v1, v2, v3, ...
> and remove everything that appears to be unrelated (arithmetic
> expressions, I/O, conditions and loops)
> obfuscate it ...
> I understand that this can represent some amount of work.
> But I need something to work on.
> ----- Mail original -----
> > De: moose-technology(a)googlecode.com
> > À: moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > Envoyé: Mercredi 19 Octobre 2011 14:25:40
> > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 728 in moose-technology: VerveineJ
> > places methods in the wrong classes
> > Comment #3 on issue 728 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com : VerveineJ places
> > methods
> > in the wrong classes
> > http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=728
> > I will certainly not close it :). I reproduced it several times on
> > proprietary case studies. I will try to create a simpler case, but
> > maybe in
> > the meantime others have experienced something similar.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> Moose-dev mailing list
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list