Hi,
Yes, there is. Groups are expensive, so for longer computations we want to
work with raw collections.
Groups are more useful when we get in the UI. You can always pass
asMooseGroup to any object when you script. For annotated methods
(properties), they should return groups. So, for groups we have methods
like:
FAMIXType>>methodsGroup
<navigation: 'Methods'>
^MooseGroup
withAll: self methods
withDescription: 'Methods from ' , self mooseName
Doru
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>wrote;wrote:
I do not understand why it is not called
#allSubclasses
Returning a group of famixclass seems to be what one would expect no?
indeed we could also add a group.
Is there is a convention to create groups or not?
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"