[Moose-dev] Re: Unexpected behavior in Moose/VerveineJ superclass

Hi guys! We've been looking with Alex today at a model built with VerveineJ and imported in Moose. In the following example: public class <http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/net.sf.jung/jung-graph-impl/2.0.1/edu/uci/ics/jung/graph/OrderedKAryTree.java#> OrderedKAryTree<V, E> extends AbstractTypedGraph<http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/net.s… <V, E> implements Tree<http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/net.sf.jung/jung-ap… <V, E> If I obtain the object referring to the OrderedKAryTree and I call superclass I get Tree instead of AbstractTypedGraph. However, if I call directSuperclasses I get both Tree and AbstractTypedGraph. Is this normal behavior? Thanks, M. * Code available at: http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/net.sf.jung/jung-graph-impl… -- Mircea Lungu, PhD. Researcher Software Composition Group University of Bern _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev