4 Jun
2012
4 Jun
'12
8:06 p.m.
Yep, easy:
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
rawView := view container.
Here is an example:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"Preambule. It includes the initialization. "
| view rawView |
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
rawView := view container.
"enter your script below"
"-------------"
"-------------"
rawView add: ROElement sprite.
view nodes: (1 to: 20).
"-------------"
"-------------"
"Below is the initiation of the menu and opening the visualization"
ROEaselMorphic new populateMenuOn: view.
view open
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Cheers,
Alexandre
On Jun 2, 2012, at 12:47 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Just a note:
When we accept something in the Easel, we tell the view variable to render.
If we get two variables, we need to get them to affect the same low level model, such
that we can tell the rawView to render. This means that the ROMondrianViewBuilder should
be changed to offer a reference to the underlying ROView.
Doru
On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:37, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hi,
On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
How about view and rawView?
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
Innovation comes in least expected form.
That is, if it is expected, it already happened.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >
shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to
ROView?
I think not. My idea was that the GLMMondrianEasel will be switched to the
ROMondrianViewBuilder when it will work. Like this we can edit at both levels.
Or maybe we find another solution? Maybe we can just offer both view variables in the
same Easel?
Maybe having view and roView. What would be a good name for the instance of ROView?
Alexandre
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
> On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu.
However, this is a rather primitive Easel.
>>
>> In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now
added all these editors in the Moose menu.
>>
>> In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the
World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into
Tools (like PetitParser does).
>>
>> Alex, what do you say?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Yesterday is a fact.
>> Tomorrow is a possibility.
>> Today is a challenge."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"We can create beautiful models in a vacuum.
But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev