8 Jun
2010
8 Jun
'10
4:04 p.m.
Hi,
The Shape hierarchy is supposed to be extended as a white-box framework.
However, indeed it would make sense to start investing in a broader
framework. And yes, EyeSee is still on the to do list ... but it looks
like it does not yet get to the top. If anyone wants to join, (s)he
would be welcome :)
Doru
On 7 Jun 2010, at 15:48, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I agree with this. I made this shape for a punctual
need. We are
currently experimenting differentiation of code profiling. We need
to see the evolution of a metric for a particular program element
(class, method or package). Maybe adding such a graph will help,
maybe not.
Alexandre
On 7 Jun 2010, at 09:39, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"When people care, great things can happen."
but alex mondrian is about nodes and edges
I really suggest that you do not bend it to make other stuff fit
into it.
Better start something else
a library
that you could use for mondrian and some other experiences
else it will always be clunky
Stef
On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev The screenshot should be self explainable.
I would love to have EyeSee
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
<Screen shot 2010-06-04 at
17.35.10.png>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev