25 Nov
2007
25 Nov
'07
12:03 p.m.
not clear to me but for now I will make sure that I get node instead
of nil
On 23 nov. 07, at 21:39, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Without thinking through all implications, me also.
In the long term, I'd favor to model "sides" of classes as some first
level entity ... introducing "group side" als die Dritte im Bunde.
But that is for a future FAMIX extension package.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , stephane ducasse wrote:
testInstanceAndClassSideWhenMergingClassAndMetaclass
| node |
node := self model entityNamed:
#'Root::Smalltalk::ReferenceModel::TheRoot'.
self assert: (self model entityNamed:
#'Root::Smalltalk::ReferenceModel::TheRoot_class' ifAbsent: [nil])
isNil.
self assert: node instanceSide == node.
self assert: node classSide == nil.
nil or node ?
I would prefer node so that we get a circular situation
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev