20 Feb
2009
20 Feb
'09
3:13 p.m.
Ok, thanks. It makes sense
Alexandre
On 20 Feb 2009, at 15:07, Simon Denier wrote:
On 20 févr. 09, at 14:53, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Ah yes, sorry. But I would expect one to save different package
independently no ? Usually, I set a different comment for each
package I save.
Porting Moose to Squeak sometimes implies modifying multiple
packages at the same times, moving methods between packages,
changing the importer and the model and the tests...
Besides I still get one comment window for each package saved with
MooseAll, so I can still write a particular comment for each package
if necessary.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Dear SqMoose friends,
i was wondering whether Moose-All is necessary since we have
MooseLoader.
The dependencies defined on Moose-All could be made explicit said
in MooseLoader.
You still need MooseAll to make a single save of the multiple
packages of Moose. Not sure you can do that with the installer.