[Moose-dev] Fwd: Re: metamodel from Smalltalk Code

Hi Sara,

for some unfortunate reason, the mapping between Smalltalk namespaces and model packages is not 1:1. One of the exceptions is that all SCG.Moose.FAMIX* classes are modeled using FAMIX.* meta-descriptions.

If this is a real problem for your application, I can fix that tomorrow.

cheers, AA

On 14 Aug 2007, at 21:04 , sellossa@ensieta.fr wrote:

Hi Adrian!

I get something weird when I use it for SCG.Moose. When I do: |package| SCG.Moose asMetaDescription classes. package:=SCG.Moose asMetaDescription inspect.

package doesn't contain the entites FAMIXClass, FAMIXAttribute and so on...

However, FAMIX entites are defined in the namespace SCG.Moose, isn't it?

Thanks you for your help

Sara