thank you Adrian Indeed, It could be useful for my application. Sara > Hi Sara, > > for some unfortunate reason, the mapping between Smalltalk namespaces > and model packages is not 1:1. One of the exceptions is that all > SCG.Moose.FAMIX* classes are modeled using FAMIX.* meta-descriptions. > > If this is a real problem for your application, I can fix that > tomorrow. > > cheers, > AA > > > > On 14 Aug 2007, at 21:04 , sellossa(a)ensieta.fr wrote: > >> Hi Adrian! >> >> I get something weird when I use it for SCG.Moose. >> When I do: >> |package| >> SCG.Moose asMetaDescription classes. >> package:=SCG.Moose asMetaDescription inspect. >> >> package doesn't contain the entites FAMIXClass, FAMIXAttribute and >> so on... >> >> However, FAMIX entites are defined in the namespace SCG.Moose, >> isn't it? >> >> Thanks you for your help >> >> Sara > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >