Ben Coman wrote:
Is there anything (at all) to gain in my continuing to use
ROMondrianViewBuilder versus "native" Roassal?
Is ROMondrianViewBuilder "just" for backward compatability to ease the
transition and draw people into the new system?
Or... is there stuff that ROMondrianViewBuilder does better than
"native" Roassal - in terms of conciseness, ease of use, flexibility,
access to layouts, features, etc...
I am trying to determine whether putting effort into the perhaps
easier step of going from Mondrian to ROMondrianViewBuilder may be
wasted leaving me missing out on any new power of Roassal, or require
more effort later to rework for native Roassal.
You may have gone over this before, but how do the purpose and
architecture of the two differ?
cheers -ben
_______________________________________________
I should add, more specifically this is in relation to being more of a
manual drawing application that a completely automated layout of data
(although the auto layouts will be a very handy feature). I think at
some point I did send to a preview of the application I am working on
implementing the model of the Power System. Also, is there any
difference between the two in integration with Glamour?