1 Apr
2009
1 Apr
'09
10:50 a.m.
For me, the difference comes from the instantiation part: classes have
a type and can be instantiated, whereas types can not be instantianted
(at least in mainstream OO languages). FAMIXType can represent pure
abstract classes like Java interfaces.
However, with respect to this I feel uncomfortable with
FAMIXType>>attributes
Renaming parentClass -> parentType is for unambiguity purpose (since
parentClass points to a FAMIXType anyway)
PS: I see that Doru was faster
On 1 avr. 09, at 10:26, Laval Jannik wrote:
Hi all,
What is the meaning of FAMIXType ?
I know its subclass is FAMIXClass, but why don't we merge them ?
In FAMIXMethod, the variable parentClass has been changed in
parentType.
I think this is less clear.
The problem is that I don't see what is FAMIXType :)
Thanks for your help.
Cheers
Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon