27 Sep
2007
27 Sep
'07
1 a.m.
Oops, forgot reply all.
On 26 Sep 2007, at 23:53 , Adrian Kuhn wrote:
On 26 Sep 2007, at 18:30 , Tudor Girba wrote:
As for Meta and Hapax, Adrian said that he
reserves the right to
license them and that we should discuss about it after we get the
agreement with the Unibe. But, in a follow up mail he changed his
mind and said that "if we come to some nice agreement with Univ its
okay to license these two bundles under BSD". I must admit that I am
a bit confused, but perhaps this was just another misunderstanding :)
It is the same I wrote in my mail back then
All these are issues I'd like to be addresses
and taken into account
when officially (re)licensing Moose now. Personally I would prefer to
have a license that allows us to be more specific about what we
consider to be fair use. But I am not strictly against BSD as well,
it would be even okay for me to license Meta as such if we find to
some agreement that ensures fairness for all involved parties
and that still applies.
AA