[Moose-dev] Re: releasing the configuration

Hi Doru, Yes. I solely use MetacelloBrowser (instead of Monticello) to manage the version of Mondrian. This experiment as a testbed before I use it for Moose. Before the MetacelloToolbox was released, I had my own salsa and it worked quite well. I switched to the toolbox recently, and experienced some problems, which were neither easy to reproduce nor write test that exhibit them. I will try again with the new version of Metacello. Maybe the situation has improved. Nested configurations are not really supported now. However, this should not be a big problem to add. MetacelloBrowser is essentially a GUI for Metacello and its toolbox. We should get rid of the Monticello browser. It is too low level (saving packages instead generating a software version). Yes. This is my plan. Cheers, Alexandre NB: I still currently do not have Phd Student. I am therefore slow on many important things, including Moose and Mondrian. I hope the situation will soon improve. -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.