3 Dec
2009
3 Dec
'09
8:17 p.m.
Thanks simon, it makes sense.
Alexandre
On 3 Dec 2009, at 11:11, Simon Denier wrote:
On 3 déc. 2009, at 08:57, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hi,
I would kindly ask you to place an entry in the issue tracker
before you start working on something (even if it's not a bug):
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/list
Also, when you add an issue, please make sure to tag it at least
with the Component that is affected by it. If you want to work on
it, also assign it to yourself.
This has the benefit of communicating your intention around and
synchronize with the rest of us. If you want to be up to date with
the changes in the issue tracker, you can subscribe to the RSS feed:
http://code.google.com/feeds/p/moose-technology/issueupdates/basic
I was not sure I felt 100% comfortable with that. There are already
many things in the bug tracker, some do not feel like bug.
For example: 41 Started › [MOOSE] port SCG algorithms to SqMoose
simon.denier Todo Feb 2009 Sep 22 4.1 Algos Medium
The wiki pages do not work for this task too, unless someone is
willing to do some wiki-gardening.
So I spent some time this morning to play with google code, see if
we could have two tabs of issues, one for defects and enhancements,
one for project and long-term goals. We cant.
So I spent some more time configuring the issues page, tweaking a
few things which annoyed me.
From now on:
1) when you create an issue as a developer, the issue is no longer
automatically assigned to you. It is created as 'New' without an
owner.
If you want/start to tackle an issue, first edit it:
- mark it as started
- put your name as owner so that we know you are working on that
I added the column 'Reporter' to see who reported the issue. I also
spent some times this morning 'unregistering' myself from issue I
cant deal with right now. It means there are lots of 'new' issues
now if anyone is willing to take them. I suggest you do the same if
you dont want we come after you about issue XXX :)
2) I change a bit the type of issues. In particular, I remove Todo
and Task which were fuzzy and add Engineering and Project (I also
updated the current issues to mirror that).
Basically, Engineering is for any activities related to maintenance,
refactoring the source code, enhancing its quality, applying lint
rules, conforming to regularities, etc. There is lots to do in this
area and unfortunately, no reward.
Project is in particular for what Doru suggests, that is long-term
projects you undertake, or even more small tasks which are somehow
autonomous from the code base. The wizard if a good example of that.
Type-Engineering = (Re)engineering the code base to enhance its
quality Type-Defect = Report of a software defect Type-Enhancement =
Request for enhancement Type-Project = Long-term project or
autonomous task Type-Review = Request for a code review Type-Other =
Some other kind of issue
So next time you enter an issue, *please* take a bit of time to
think about the type.
I hope it will help us to get a better picture of what is going on
in the Moose dev, and where things should be going.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev