1 Feb
2008
1 Feb
'08
3 p.m.
I think that is a good solution to have a FAMIXReference class as a
first subclass of FAMIXAbstractAssociation:
FAMIXInvocation, FAMIXAccess, FAMIXInheritanceDefination, etc. should
be the direct subclasses of FAMIXReference.
fAMIXReference>>#isInvocation fAMIXReference>>#isAccess
fAMIXReference>>#isInheritance
you do not think that FAMIXDependency is a better name than
FAMIXReference?
Hani
On Feb 1, 2008, at 13:57 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
Hi
romain will start coding a DSM for moose (may be using mondrian may be
not).
And I would like to represent a cell as a reference aggregate which
can contain inheritance def, access, invocation.
Do you have an idea where we could define this class in the FAMIX
inheritance tree?
We thought abut a subclass of FamixAbstractionAssociation
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev