22 Nov
2011
22 Nov
'11
10:46 p.m.
I love to see these discussions.
I really want FAMIX30 to be really well documented because we should build a couple of
language importers in the future.
On Nov 22, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
This model fits both Smalltalk pragmas and Java
annotations and thus
these entities should be in the core. Now the Smalltalk importer
actually populates these entities and it works just fine.
The comment states that it talks about an example. We can add one for
Smalltalk as well.
Cheers,
Doru
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
FamixAnnotationType and FamixAnnotationInstance
are defined in Famix.Core,
so in theory they should be independent of any language. Here is the comment
from AnnotationIstance
AnnotationInstance is an instance of an AnnotationType. It links an
AnnotationType to an actual entity.
For example, the following is an AnnotationInstance in Java:
@Test(Timeout = 500)
This model fits java but not smalltalk pragmas. So is it ok to keep in Famix
core?
thanx
Nicolas and Usman
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev