5 May
2010
5 May
'10
10:22 a.m.
Hi,
MondrianPaintings holds Mondrian views which are typically 2-3 methods
each. Distribution Map, with all the Wizard and other computations is
more than that, so I think it deserves a package on its own :)
Actually, I do not like categories :). I prefer to have packages for
everything.
Cheers,
Doru
On 4 May 2010, at 16:38, Simon Denier wrote:
On 4 mai 2010, at 10:36, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting
is the right one."
Hi Cyrille,
I have a bit of feedback for Distribution Map:
- The computation from Distribution Map Wizard is too expensive
because you iterate over the meta elements and for each of them you
go over all elements of Moose through the method
includesElementsOfType:
It would be better if you would go over all cached groups and
decide based on that rather than traversing the entire entities
collection (which can be millions of objects).
- It would be better if Distribution Map gets its own package
because it starts to be large
What does large mean in this context? I mean, I don't understand the
benefit of creating a single package for DistributionMap while all
others are under MondrianPaintings (within their own categories)
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev