17 May
2012
17 May
'12
10:22 p.m.
Hi Alex,
This is the discipline in Moose, and I want to keep it. Also, having multiple packages
eases collaboration.
So, what does not right now mean? I can also do it, if you want.
Cheers,
Doru
On 17 May 2012, at 22:10, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I am absolutely for in principle. However there is no
good way to manage many packages. Adding or removing a dependent package is just painful.
It also significantly increase the loading time.
So yes, we will split Roassal, but not right now :-)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On May 17, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Problem solving efficiency grows with the abstractness level of problem
understanding."
Hi,
Moose was the first user of RPackage, and RPackage works best when we have one package
per category.
Roassal does not comply to this requirement, but it should because I want Moose to
continue to be a good RPackage citizen :).
Alex, could you take care of splitting it?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev