17 Feb
2008
17 Feb
'08
11:39 p.m.
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On F
Hi all,
Actually, my description was so short because I don't fully know what it
does either.
When indeed the inventor of the Law of Demeter came to Bern to have a
talk about the traversals he is so fond of, Adrian implemented a
prototype of these traversals as an addition to Fame, to learn about it
himself beforehand.
How it exactly works, I'm not sure, I haven't had a look at it myself
yet either. But since it was implemented in VW, and filed out, it's in
Squeak now too. But it doesn't work, and since I don't know the code nor
exactly what it does, I haven't really had a look at it yet. Which is
also why the traversals were between parentheses :)
I'm sorry for the confusion. It didn't seem that important to me either
since it doesn't have any impact on the workings of the rest of fame.
cheers,
Toon
No traversals is Adrian's implementation of
the demeter traversals.
Everything to do with Famix is one level lower than what we are
working on.
Toon
I have no idea what you are talking about? bt sentences do not add any
semantics value.
It is important that people that are not pair programming with adrian
can understand
what is said in this mailing-list.
What is "implementation of demeter traversals"?
stef hypothesis: "Did adrian implemented this string-based path
interpreter that the "inventor"
of law of demeter is so found of? Does it mean that we have to debug
strings
to debug metamodel traversal in FAME (arghhhhhhhh)."
Please tell me that I'm wrong :)
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev