29 Apr
2010
29 Apr
'10
3:53 p.m.
Hi,
Another related idea is to not use srcML for the main parsing, but to
keep it around for custom queries.
So, we could still keep the current solution with inFusion for the
main models, and have srcML for when we want to write queries that
need access to AST.
For example, if you do not have the right libraries, inFusion will not
create annotation objects. If I would have access to the AST, I could
write a query (even if it is expensive at first) that checks the AST
of class for the existence of such annotations.
I would use this. And maybe like this the srcML interface would grow
in time and get better. What do you think?
Cheers,
Doru
On 28 Apr 2010, at 14:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
As Simon said, the type resolution in C is easy. In
C++ it is
another beast.
Alexandre
On 28 Apr 2010, at 04:47, Simon Denier wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What we can governs what we wish."
On 28 avr. 2010, at 10:36, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev the problem is that meta model is different so
you would have to
map everything.
Besides, from what I have seen, the generated xml is sometimes not
regular: i.e. similar things in the code does not have the same xml
representation. This makes it cumbersome as it is not documented,
so you have to decode the grammar from the xml and adapt to such
irregularities.
In the end, you still have to maintain a xml parser for each
language and you still dont have control about what is extracted.
And you have to do the type resolution :)
Stef
On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Laval Jannik wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi all,
I am looking at srcML, and I see that it make XML files from Java
and C++ source code.
Since we use it for C source code, it should be possible to make
it works with C++ and java.
This strategy allows us to not us a special tool for each language.
What do you think about it ?
Cheers
---
Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev