the problem is that meta model is different so you would have to map everything.

Stef On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: > Hi all, > > I am looking at srcML, and I see that it make XML files from > Java and C++ source code. > > Since we use it for C source code, it should be possible to make > it works with C++ and java. > This strategy allows us to not us a special tool for each > language. > > What do you think about it ? > > Cheers > --- > Jannik Laval > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

As Simon said, the type resolution in C is easy. In C++ it is another beast. Alexandre On 28 Apr 2010, at 04:47, Simon Denier wrote: > > On 28 avr. 2010, at 10:36, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> the problem is that meta model is different so you would have to map everything. > > > Besides, from what I have seen, the generated xml is sometimes not regular: i.e. similar things in the code does not have the same xml representation. This makes it cumbersome as it is not documented, so you have to decode the grammar from the xml and adapt to such irregularities. > > In the end, you still have to maintain a xml parser for each language and you still dont have control about what is extracted. And you have to do the type resolution :) > > >> >> Stef >> >> >> On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am looking at srcML, and I see that it make XML files from Java and C++ source code. >>> >>> Since we use it for C source code, it should be possible to make it works with C++ and java. >>> This strategy allows us to not us a special tool for each language. >>> >>> What do you think about it ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> --- >>> Jannik Laval >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > Simon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

A model originally created with inFusion, could then be refined by loading srcML files, to add for example AST info. Alexandre On 29 Apr 2010, at 09:53, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Another related idea is to not use srcML for the main parsing, > but to keep it around for custom queries. > > So, we could still keep the current solution with inFusion for > the main models, and have srcML for when we want to write > queries that need access to AST. > > For example, if you do not have the right libraries, inFusion > will not create annotation objects. If I would have access to > the AST, I could write a query (even if it is expensive at > first) that checks the AST of class for the existence of such > annotations. > > I would use this. And maybe like this the srcML interface would > grow in time and get better. What do you think? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > On 28 Apr 2010, at 14:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> As Simon said, the type resolution in C is easy. In C++ it is >> another beast. >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 28 Apr 2010, at 04:47, Simon Denier wrote: >> >>> >>> On 28 avr. 2010, at 10:36, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> the problem is that meta model is different so you would have >>>> to map everything. >>> >>> >>> Besides, from what I have seen, the generated xml is sometimes >>> not regular: i.e. similar things in the code does not have the >>> same xml representation. This makes it cumbersome as it is not >>> documented, so you have to decode the grammar from the xml and >>> adapt to such irregularities. >>> >>> In the end, you still have to maintain a xml parser for each >>> language and you still dont have control about what is >>> extracted. And you have to do the type resolution :) >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I am looking at srcML, and I see that it make XML files from >>>>> Java and C++ source code. >>>>> >>>>> Since we use it for C source code, it should be possible to >>>>> make it works with C++ and java. >>>>> This strategy allows us to not us a special tool for each >>>>> language. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think about it ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> --- >>>>> Jannik Laval >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> Simon >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "What we can governs what we wish." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

well probably now with how much effort. stef On Apr 30, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Exactly. > > Doru > > On 30 Apr 2010, at 05:47, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> A model originally created with inFusion, could then be refined >> by loading srcML files, to add for example AST info. >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 29 Apr 2010, at 09:53, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Another related idea is to not use srcML for the main parsing, >>> but to keep it around for custom queries. >>> >>> So, we could still keep the current solution with inFusion for >>> the main models, and have srcML for when we want to write >>> queries that need access to AST. >>> >>> For example, if you do not have the right libraries, inFusion >>> will not create annotation objects. If I would have access to >>> the AST, I could write a query (even if it is expensive at >>> first) that checks the AST of class for the existence of such >>> annotations. >>> >>> I would use this. And maybe like this the srcML interface >>> would grow in time and get better. What do you think? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> >>> On 28 Apr 2010, at 14:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>>> As Simon said, the type resolution in C is easy. In C++ it is >>>> another beast. >>>> >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28 Apr 2010, at 04:47, Simon Denier wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28 avr. 2010, at 10:36, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> the problem is that meta model is different so you would >>>>>> have to map everything. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Besides, from what I have seen, the generated xml is >>>>> sometimes not regular: i.e. similar things in the code does >>>>> not have the same xml representation. This makes it >>>>> cumbersome as it is not documented, so you have to decode >>>>> the grammar from the xml and adapt to such irregularities. >>>>> >>>>> In the end, you still have to maintain a xml parser for each >>>>> language and you still dont have control about what is >>>>> extracted. And you have to do the type resolution :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Stef >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am looking at srcML, and I see that it make XML files >>>>>>> from Java and C++ source code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since we use it for C source code, it should be possible >>>>>>> to make it works with C++ and java. >>>>>>> This strategy allows us to not us a special tool for each >>>>>>> language. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you think about it ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Jannik Laval >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Simon >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "What we can governs what we wish." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "We are all great at making mistakes." > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

How the elements composing the AST can be represented. Maybe xml queries are enough at that level... Alexandre On 30 Apr 2010, at 09:02, Tudor Girba wrote: > It is cost that I had in mind from the beginning. Now, we have > CAnalyzer in place, so I guess it would be quite cheap to > generalize it a bit and to hook it with the FAMIXFileAnchor to > get an AST of it. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 30 Apr 2010, at 09:06, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> well probably now with how much effort. >> >> stef >> >> On Apr 30, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Exactly. >>> >>> Doru >>> >>> On 30 Apr 2010, at 05:47, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>>> A model originally created with inFusion, could then be >>>> refined by loading srcML files, to add for example AST info. >>>> >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29 Apr 2010, at 09:53, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Another related idea is to not use srcML for the main >>>>> parsing, but to keep it around for custom queries. >>>>> >>>>> So, we could still keep the current solution with inFusion >>>>> for the main models, and have srcML for when we want to >>>>> write queries that need access to AST. >>>>> >>>>> For example, if you do not have the right libraries, >>>>> inFusion will not create annotation objects. If I would have >>>>> access to the AST, I could write a query (even if it is >>>>> expensive at first) that checks the AST of class for the >>>>> existence of such annotations. >>>>> >>>>> I would use this. And maybe like this the srcML interface >>>>> would grow in time and get better. What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Doru >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28 Apr 2010, at 14:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> As Simon said, the type resolution in C is easy. In C++ it >>>>>> is another beast. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 28 Apr 2010, at 04:47, Simon Denier wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28 avr. 2010, at 10:36, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the problem is that meta model is different so you would >>>>>>>> have to map everything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Besides, from what I have seen, the generated xml is >>>>>>> sometimes not regular: i.e. similar things in the code >>>>>>> does not have the same xml representation. This makes it >>>>>>> cumbersome as it is not documented, so you have to decode >>>>>>> the grammar from the xml and adapt to such irregularities. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the end, you still have to maintain a xml parser for >>>>>>> each language and you still dont have control about what >>>>>>> is extracted. And you have to do the type resolution :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Stef >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am looking at srcML, and I see that it make XML files >>>>>>>>> from Java and C++ source code. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Since we use it for C source code, it should be possible >>>>>>>>> to make it works with C++ and java. >>>>>>>>> This strategy allows us to not us a special tool for >>>>>>>>> each language. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What do you think about it ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> Jannik Laval >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Simon >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>> >>>>> "What we can governs what we wish." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "We are all great at making mistakes." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Yesterday is a fact. > Tomorrow is a possibility. > Today is a challenge." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

> Perhaps having a look at Opax would ease a bit in getting from > XML to objects in the image. I haven't checked the Store@SCG, but what is opax? It is not listed in the tools section of the moose website. ScgBib does not know about this word it apparently. Cheers, Alexandre > > > On 30 Apr 2010, at 17:18, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> How the elements composing the AST can be represented. Maybe >> xml queries are enough at that level... >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 30 Apr 2010, at 09:02, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> It is cost that I had in mind from the beginning. Now, we have >>> CAnalyzer in place, so I guess it would be quite cheap to >>> generalize it a bit and to hook it with the FAMIXFileAnchor to >>> get an AST of it. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> On 30 Apr 2010, at 09:06, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> well probably now with how much effort. >>>> >>>> stef >>>> >>>> On Apr 30, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>> >>>>> Exactly. >>>>> >>>>> Doru >>>>> >>>>> On 30 Apr 2010, at 05:47, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> A model originally created with inFusion, could then be >>>>>> refined by loading srcML files, to add for example AST info. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 29 Apr 2010, at 09:53, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Another related idea is to not use srcML for the main >>>>>>> parsing, but to keep it around for custom queries. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, we could still keep the current solution with inFusion >>>>>>> for the main models, and have srcML for when we want to >>>>>>> write queries that need access to AST. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For example, if you do not have the right libraries, >>>>>>> inFusion will not create annotation objects. If I would >>>>>>> have access to the AST, I could write a query (even if it >>>>>>> is expensive at first) that checks the AST of class for >>>>>>> the existence of such annotations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would use this. And maybe like this the srcML interface >>>>>>> would grow in time and get better. What do you think? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Doru >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28 Apr 2010, at 14:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As Simon said, the type resolution in C is easy. In C++ >>>>>>>> it is another beast. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 28 Apr 2010, at 04:47, Simon Denier wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 28 avr. 2010, at 10:36, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the problem is that meta model is different so you >>>>>>>>>> would have to map everything. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Besides, from what I have seen, the generated xml is >>>>>>>>> sometimes not regular: i.e. similar things in the code >>>>>>>>> does not have the same xml representation. This makes it >>>>>>>>> cumbersome as it is not documented, so you have to >>>>>>>>> decode the grammar from the xml and adapt to such >>>>>>>>> irregularities. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In the end, you still have to maintain a xml parser for >>>>>>>>> each language and you still dont have control about what >>>>>>>>> is extracted. And you have to do the type resolution :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Stef >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at srcML, and I see that it make XML >>>>>>>>>>> files from Java and C++ source code. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Since we use it for C source code, it should be >>>>>>>>>>> possible to make it works with C++ and java. >>>>>>>>>>> This strategy allows us to not us a special tool for >>>>>>>>>>> each language. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What do you think about it ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> Jannik Laval >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Simon >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "What we can governs what we wish." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>> >>>>> "We are all great at making mistakes." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Yesterday is a fact. >>> Tomorrow is a possibility. >>> Today is a challenge." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Problem solving should be concentrated on describing > the problem in a way that is relevant for the solution." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev