[Moose-dev] Re: srcML for C++ and Java

As Simon said, the type resolution in C is easy. In C++ it is another beast. Alexandre On 28 Apr 2010, at 04:47, Simon Denier wrote: > > On 28 avr. 2010, at 10:36, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> the problem is that meta model is different so you would have to >> map everything. > > > Besides, from what I have seen, the generated xml is sometimes not > regular: i.e. similar things in the code does not have the same xml > representation. This makes it cumbersome as it is not documented, > so you have to decode the grammar from the xml and adapt to such > irregularities. > > In the end, you still have to maintain a xml parser for each > language and you still dont have control about what is extracted. > And you have to do the type resolution :) > > >> >> Stef >> >> >> On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am looking at srcML, and I see that it make XML files from Java >>> and C++ source code. >>> >>> Since we use it for C source code, it should be possible to make >>> it works with C++ and java. >>> This strategy allows us to not us a special tool for each language. >>> >>> What do you think about it ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> --- >>> Jannik Laval >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > Simon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev