Moose-dev April 2012

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

19 participants
105 discussions

Issue 601 in moose-technology: Covered methods and tests

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Hapao New issue 601 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Covered methods and tests http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=601 It would be good to see what are the tests that _indirectly_ tests a methods. Thanks Laurent & Patrick

11 years, 10 months

Issue 793 in moose-technology: TreePresentation does not show the selected item when rendering with Morphic

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Glamour Milestone-4.7 New issue 793 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: TreePresentation does not show the selected item when rendering with Morphic http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=793 You can reproduce the problem with the example found in: GLMBasicExamples>>treeWithInitialSelection " | browser | browser := self new treeWithInitialSelection. browser openOn: { #first->{$a->{}. $c->{}. $d->{}}. #second->{$e->{}. $f->{}}. #third->{$h->{}} }. (browser panes first port: #selection) value: (browser panes first port: #entity) value. " | browser | browser := GLMTabulator new. browser column: #one; column: [ :c | c row: #two; row: #three ]. (browser transmit) to: #one; andShow: [ :a | (a tree) title: 'first tree'; children: [ :x | x value ]. (a tree) title: 'second tree'; children: [ :x | x value ] ]. (browser transmit) to: #two; from: #one; andShow: [ :a | a text title: 'Selection preview' ]. (browser transmit) to: #three; from: #one port: #selectionPath; andShow: [ :a | a text title: 'Selection path preview' ]. ^ browser

11 years, 10 months

Reviewing Fuel export/import utility

by Martin Dias

Hello, I'm looking to improve current implementation, and maybe you can help me. The current procedure is based in a custom serialization of each MooseElement. It's inspired on MSE, I describe this with the following pseudo-code: serialize: aMooseElement (MooseModel meta descriptionOf: aMooseElement class) allAttributes do: [ :anAttribute | | values | values := anAttribute getFrom: aMooseElement. (self shouldIgnore: anAttribute withAll: values) ifFalse: [ self serialize: anAttribute withAll: values ] ]. where: shouldIgnore: anAttribute withAll: values ^ values isEmpty or: [ anAttribute isDerived or: [ anAttribute type == FM3MetaDescription boolean and: [ values size == 1 and: [ values first == false ]]]] The advantage of serializing the MooseElements in this way (and not just as a normal object) is to avoid storing unnecessary stuff that aMooseElement references. It's a disadvantage using FM3PropertyDescription>>getFrom: (and then to import, FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:) which ends sending #perform: of the corresponding accessor selector. It'd be better to use #instVarAt: (and #instVarAt:put:) as Fuel normally does. I hope I've been clear enough to explain up to this point. Now my question: Do you think Fuel can do something on each MooseElement like - clean up some unnecessary references - declare some instance variables as transient - if it's not good idea to modify the elements, create a method like MooseElement>>copyWithoutDerivedValues, and so actually serialize such copy instead of the original element - any other ??? and thus, serialize the MooseElements as normal Fuel objects, removing the custom procedure. I'll be happy to receive some help from Moose and Fame experts! Thanks in advance. Martín

11 years, 10 months

Issue 509 in moose-technology: Modularization Quality Metric

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: andreho...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Famix New issue 509 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Modularization Quality Metric http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=509 We implemented the Bunch metrics of coupling and cohesion as quality metrics for existing packages (FAMIXPackage) and namespaces (FAMIXNamespace). Now the idea is to implement the Modularization Quality Metric as a quality metric for existing group of packages (FAMIXPackageGroup) and namespaces (FAMIXNamespaceGroup). Pointer to the papers that propose the metrics: Using Automatic Clustering to Produce High-Level System Organizations of Source Code (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=693283) Bunch: A Clustering Tool for the Recovery and Maintenance of Software System Structures (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=792498)

11 years, 10 months

Issue 767 in moose-technology: Book: presentation names are confusing

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 767 by sean.p.d...(a)gmail.com: Book: presentation names are confusing http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=767 For example, on http://www.themoosebook.org/book/internals/glamour/presentations/action-list ActionListPresentation is referenced, but the class name is GLMActionListPresentation. So, when I pasted it into a workspace, it was highlighted red as an unrecognized class. I think it'd be clearer to either use full presentation class names or spaces between camel case (e.g. "Action List Presentation"). The same is true for some of the other presentations e.g. DiffPresentation

11 years, 10 months

Issue 644 in moose-technology: A fly by help to show each time the source code of an entity

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 644 by cy.delau...(a)gmail.com: A fly by help to show each time the source code of an entity http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=644 Maybe it would be interesting when navigating in moose, to always have a fly by help that show the source code of an element

11 years, 10 months

Issue 782 in moose-technology: inFamix should export basic metrics for methods

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: georgega...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-ExternalTools New issue 782 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: inFamix should export basic metrics for methods http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=782 inFamix should export basic method metrics: - LOC (lines of code) - NOS (number of statements) - CYCLO (cyclomatic complexity)

11 years, 10 months

Issue 582 in moose-technology: Watcher support in Glamour

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Glamour New issue 582 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Watcher support in Glamour http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=582 Like we now have a statusbar, we should also have a detailed preview shown in a floating Watcher window. The behavior would be similar to Quick Look on Mac.

11 years, 11 months

build notification to the mailing list

by Tudor Girba

Hi, We just had over the last couple of days some 194 failed tests: http://ci.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/957/ 191 of them came from a parallel commit into Mondrian. I solved it now, but to prevent this kind of thing in the future, I now changed the build to send notifications to this mailing list. We still have three tests (related to Monticello) that are failing on the server. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."

11 years, 11 months

TreeMapLayout

by Dennis Schenk

Hi, I made some progress with the TreeMapLayout. Two challenges remain to be solved. The first one is related to dragging. It is kind if complicated to explain in words, so I made this short screencast: http://cl.ly/150n1t2Z2h1y3L0z1U0L As you can see the positions of the shapes get updated only when hovering over them, not instantly when dragging, as I would like them to. One difference code-wise to other graph layouts is that the owner of all shapes is, in this case, not MORoot but the node "org", which is a normal MONode. I had to do this (change ownership) because MORoot does not get drawn (is this by design?). Does anyone have some ideas on what could explain this behavior? Another question would be: Is it possible to make the inner nodes not draggable? The user should not be able to move individual shapes inside the TreeMap around. Cheers, Dennis

11 years, 11 months

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev April 2012