Moose-dev April 2012

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

19 participants
105 discussions

Issue 790 in moose-technology: adding Mondrian subview interactively operates on wrong node
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 790 by google....(a)ben.coman.com.au: adding Mondrian subview interactively operates on wrong node http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=790 Executing the code snippet below in Mondrian Easel exhibits surprising behaviour. Referring to attached snapshot, clicking on a square incorrectly operates on an ellipse instead. ----8<---- view shape label. view node: 'Ellipses' forIt: [ view shape ellipse size: 30. view interaction whenClickingUpdateNode: [ :value | view forNode: value do: [ view nodes: (1 to: 5). view gridLayout. ] ] withLayoutUpdate: true. view nodes: ( 1 to: 16 ). view gridLayout. ]. view shape label. view node: 'Rectangles' forIt: [ view shape rectangle size: 30. view interaction whenClickingUpdateNode: [ :value | view forNode: value do: [ view nodes: (1 to: 5). view gridLayout. ] ] withLayoutUpdate: true. view nodes: ( 1 to: 16 ). view gridLayout. ]. Attachments: Mondrian add subview interactively.png 10.2 KB

3 7

Issue 763 in moose-technology: VerveineJ generates wrong paths in source anchors when there is a . in the root folder
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ Milestone-4.6 New issue 763 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ generates wrong paths in source anchors when there is a . in the root folder http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=763 Do this: - download: http://sourceforge.net/projects/jfreechart/files/latest/download - go to: jfreechart-1.0.14 - execute: /PATH_TO_verveine.extractor.java/verveinej.sh -Xmx2000m -- -autocp . . The fileNames all start with "0.14/./" instead of "./"

2 4

Mondrian subviews and interactions
by Ben Coman 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

I am trying to combine interactions with subviews in Mondrian but it is not working as expected. This is with a fresh Moose 4.6 downloaded today plus ConfigurationOfMondrian (AlexandreBergel.345) and [ ConfigurationOfMondrian project lastVersion load ]. As a test case, from ( World > Moose > Mondrian Easel ) I combine: Examples > interaction > variation in node size Examples > subviews > simple to produce the following example: ----8<----- view nodes: (1 to: 5) forEach: [:each | view interaction strongHighlightWhenOver: [ :v | v ]. view shape rectangle withText; size: 20. view nodes: (1 to: each). view gridLayout ]. ----8<----- However executing this in Mondrian Easel you will notice that (taking for example the third group) hovering over small squares 1 & 2 does not highlight these and hovering over small square 3 highlights the large square rather than its small square. I get my expected/required behaviour by modifying MOAnnouncer>>registerForEvent: forNodes: updateShape: updateLayout: to replace... domainNodes := (aBlockOrSymbol moValue: ann element model). nodes := ann viewRenderer nodeForDomainValues: domainNodes. by... nodes := OrderedCollection new add: ann element ; yourself. ...but I don't know what else that breaks or another way to get my required behaviour. How should I proceed? cheers, -ben

2 4

Issue 789 in moose-technology: Mondrian spelling recursive
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 789 by google....(a)ben.coman.com.au: Mondrian spelling recursive http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=789 I notice the following methods in Mondrian... resetCacheResursively resetFormCacheResursively resetMetricCachesResursively and assume the spelling should be "recursive" not "resursive"

1 1

assessment q&a
by Tudor Girba 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

Hi, This little q&a game I initiated on the humane assessment blog might be interesting for people interested in Moose: http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/assessment-q-a/ ------ Assessment is not difficult once you jump in the boat. But, this jumping can be perceived to be difficult. To dispel the magic, let's open the curtain and play a game. It's simple. You ask questions, and I will answer them on this blog. How to ask questions: • send me an email at tudor(a)tudorgirba.com • post a comment on this blog • post a tweet mentioning @humaneA, or @girba • ask me in person when you see me (I will be at PharoConf and Jazoon in the following months) What questions? Any questions. What's in it for me? You will help me shape my ideas. Your turn now. ------ Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com If you can't say why something is relevant, it probably isn't.

2 3

cannot filein st file
by Fabrizio Perin 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hi, I downloaded latest Moose and I dragged and dropped into the image a st file to file it in. Debugger popped up saying: SubscriptOutOfBounds: 1 By copy pasting the content of the st file into a workspace and by executing the workspace's content it works. here the build i used: http://ci.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/923/artifact/moose/ Cheers, Fabrizio

2 7

issue tracker labels
by Ben Coman 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

The issue tracker New Issue Template says: "Please fill in the labels with the following information: * Type-Defect, Type-Enhancement, Type-Engineering, Type-Review, Type-Other * Component-XXX" but I don't see where to do that. Where should these be set? cheers, -ben

2 1

Metanool questions
by Stéphane Ducasse 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Doru Question1 --------- I would like to save the annotations (and annotation creation) with a model. Do you have an idea where to start looking for? Because so far I'm puzzled since this is a Magritte description of FameEntity. Question2 -------- I have a question why FM3Element does not have a magritteDescription but description? should I fix it because even if we use pragma I prefer when this is regular. FM3Element >>descriptionName <magritteDescription> ^ MAStringDescription new accessor: #name; default: 'noname'; label: 'Name'; priority: 100; beRequired; yourself FM3PropertyDescription>>magritteDescriptionType <magritteDescription> ^ MASingleOptionDescription new accessor: #type; label: 'Type'; priority: 300; default: FM3 boolean; beRequired; options: {FM3 number . FM3 string . FM3 boolean}; yourself Question3 --------- FM3 number returns an AnonymousClass. I saw that FM3 number create a FM3MetaDescription which describes a class. I'm not sure that I need to add new species may be boolean, string and number are enough. Now I would like to change the an Anonymous in the UI a least. I suggest that we create an instance of a subclass of Class (I called it FM3AnonymousClass) so that we can customize the printing and other behavior the way we want. I did it but changing printOn: in such class is not invoked so I'm confused (but now I understand but still I found that confusing). FM3MetaDescription>>numberClass | class | class := Class new. class superclass: self. class setFormat: self format. class methodDictionary: MethodDictionary new. class methodDictionary at: #isPrimitive put: (self methodDictionary at: #anonymousReturnTrue). class setName: 'AnonymousClass'. ^class Do you know the relationship between such anonymous classes and FM3etaDescrption? The class comment does not say much on that :( When I read the code I guess that FM3 is a subclass of FM3MetaDescription (not sure that the superclass is FM3MetaDescription or FM3MetaDescription class), now I do not know what is the real advantages compared to have real subclasses of FM3MEtaDescription (besides being cool and yes we can do it syndrome). Now what confused me was that FM3 number superclass is FM3Object and I got it FM3MetaDescription>>number number isNil ifTrue: [ number := self numberClass basicNew. number initialize. number name: #Number. ]. ^number For changing the printOn: method I imagine that it should be put in the class methodDictionary at: #printOn: put: (self methodDictionary at: #anonymousPrintOn:). booleanClass | class | class := FM3AnonymousClass new. class superclass: self. class setFormat: self format. class methodDictionary: MethodDictionary new. class methodDictionary at: #isPrimitive put: (self methodDictionary at: #anonymousReturnTrue). class methodDictionary at: #printOn: put: (self methodDictionary at: #anonymousPrintOn:). <------- class setName: 'AnonymousClass'. ^class but it means that to define it in FM3MetaDescription. But so far it did not work… I will try again. I have problem to see the added value to recreate an independent class and metaclass core? Stef

2 2

Issue 721 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark constructors
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-ExternalTools New issue 721 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should mark constructors http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=721 Constructors should be marked with isConstructor.

2 10

FAMIXClass do not understand parentScope:
by Fabrizio Perin 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hi, the method ensureClassesAndNamespaces Invoke "parentScope:" on a class. ensureClassesAndNamespaces <menuItem: 'Ensure Classes and Namespaces' category: 'Utilities'> self allMethods do: [ :each | each parentType isNil ifTrue: [ each parentType: self unknownFAMIXClass ] ]. self allClasses do: [ :each | each parentScope isNil ifTrue: [ each parentScope: self unknownFAMIXNamespace ] ] Now FAMIXType contains the method "parentScope" implemented as: parentScope "Polymorphic alias to mimic GlobalVariable#parentScope and similar" ^ self container I believe that in the method ensureClassesAndNamespaces we should use the method "container:" instead of "parentScope:" What do you think? Cheers, Fabrizio

2 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev April 2012