Moose-dev March 2012

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

32 participants
132 discussions

Automoose
by Norbert Hartl 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Now that I found some new motivation spending some time on moose I defined a project for me to work on. In order to achieve the simple task I like to know if it is possible to export images from Automoose. I don't know how the integration of moose into jenkins is meant. I would imagine having predefined analysis diagrams shown on the jenkins project page side by side with the lint und sunit results. thanks, Norbert

5 7

numerical method in smalltalk
by Stéphane Ducasse 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

could be interesting to see if we need to some numerical analysis in moose and pharo. I will create a configuration MCSqueaksourceRepository location: 'http://squeaksource.com/DHBNumerical' user: '' password: ''

5 16

FAMIX.Invocation Help
by roberto.minelli＠usi.ch 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Hi all, I have a doubt regarding 'FAMIX.Invocation's. Suppose I've this line of Java code: > startActivity(new Intent(this, ActivityTwo.class)); When I generate the mse (using VerveineJ) this result in a FAMIX.Invocation such as > (FAMIX.Invocation (id: 8005) > (candidates (ref: 9100)) > (previous (ref: 3174)) > (receiver (ref: 2547)) > (sender (ref: 7328)) > (signature 'startActivity(Intent)')) The 'new Intent(…)' instead results in a FAMIX.Invocation such as > (FAMIX.Invocation (id: 8291) > (candidates (ref: 753)) > (sender (ref: 430)) > (signature 'Intent(Context,Class<?>)')) I need to extract the 'ActivityTwo.class' argument. Is there a way to get it? Thanks in advance for any sort of help. Cheers, RM

2 2

Re: Issue 602 in moose-technology: Hapao should provide a legend in every window
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Updates: Summary: Hapao should provide a legend in every window Comment #3 on issue 602 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Hapao should provide a legend in every window http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=602 Then let's name the issue for what it should do.

1 3

Re: Issue 439 in moose-technology: Make package blueprints work on Namespace
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #1 on issue 439 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Make package blueprints work on Namespace http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=439 I guess this won't be worked on.

1 0

failing tests
by Tudor Girba 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Hi, A ton of tests are still failing due to the issue of Collection>>union:. Most of these issues seem to come from the metrics that seem to overuse this functionality: http://ci.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/lastCompletedBuild/testR… It would be great if the authors would look over it. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Live like you mean it."

3 7

Issue 489 in moose-technology: Glamour: action list without the dropdown
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: tudor.girba Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 489 by jfabry: Glamour: action list without the dropdown http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=489 I have a Glamour pane that is an actionList where I do 5 populate:on:entitled:with: so that the pane has 5 buttons. Now what happens is that the pane also has a dropdown menu, with the same actions as the buttons. This menu should not be there according to Doru ...

1 2

Re: Issue 281 in moose-technology: Accordion should expand the last presentation
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #4 on issue 281 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Accordion should expand the last presentation http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=281 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 0

Re: Issue 240 in moose-technology: Smalltalk importer scalability
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Comment #2 on issue 240 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Smalltalk importer scalability http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=240 Anyone interested in picking this up?

1 1

Re: Issue 191 in moose-technology: Do not execute unnecessary transmissions
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-4.2 Comment #5 on issue 191 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Do not execute unnecessary transmissions http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=191 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 1

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev March 2012