Moose-dev October 2012

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

25 participants
139 discussions

Re: Issue 736 in moose-technology: Moose crashes when importing Citezen (OrderedCollection(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #unsafeAdd:)
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Updates: Summary: Moose crashes when importing Citezen (OrderedCollection(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #unsafeAdd:) Comment #3 on issue 736 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Moose crashes when importing Citezen (OrderedCollection(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #unsafeAdd:) http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=736 (No comment was entered for this change.)

4 15

Issue 647 in moose-technology: Integrate torch package visualization
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 647 by cy.delau...(a)gmail.com: Integrate torch package visualization http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=647 Maybe it would be a good idea (?) to use / integrate the torch packages visualization in moose ? http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/53/15/08/PDF/Uqui10a-Torch-WCRE10.p…

2 4

Re: Issue 469 in moose-technology: integrate Kontractor
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Updates: Labels: Milestone-4.3 Comment #4 on issue 469 by tudor.girba: integrate Kontractor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=469 What is the status of this?

1 3

Re: Issue 437 in moose-technology: Text is not affected by zooming in Mondrian
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Comment #1 on issue 437 by alexandre.bergel: Text is not affected by zooming in Mondrian http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=437 Situation has been slightly improved, but this is clearly not satisfactory

1 4

importers page
by Tudor Girba 28 Apr '13

28 Apr '13

Hi, I created a page dedicated to importing instructions: http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers A good example of how these instructions should look like can be found here: http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers/importJavaWithinFusion We would need more detailed information about: - Import C# with PMCS http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers/importCSharpWithPMCS - Import C with CAnalyzer http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers/importCWithCAnalyzer Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Obvious things are difficult to teach."

7 14

Issue 845 in moose-technology: some Roassal layouts broken when nested
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 24 Mar '13

24 Mar '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 845 by google....(a)ben.coman.com.au: some Roassal layouts broken when nested http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=845 The application I am developing needs to apply layouts to nested elements. I noticed that some layouts did not work when nested - so I've done a full review of the layout listed in ROMondrianExample>>chooseLayoutOn: as per the attached image. On the left is the non-nested-result and on the right is the nested-result. I have attached the mcz with a slightly modified #chooseLayoutOn: as well as #chooseLayoutNestedOn: for comparison. Attachments: Roassal-BenComan.313.mcz 241 KB ROMondrianExample-chooseLayoutNestedOn.png 127 KB

1 9

Re: Issue 382 in moose-technology: CMD + W does not close Mondrian window
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 16 Mar '13

16 Mar '13

Comment #1 on issue 382 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: CMD + W does not close Mondrian window http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=382 This is still an issue and it hinders usability. Alex, could you take a look at it?

1 1

Issue 858 in moose-technology: Roassal contribution ROLineEndDiamond
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Mar '13

03 Mar '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 858 by benjamin...(a)gmail.com: Roassal contribution ROLineEndDiamond http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=858 I needed a diamond line end symbol to represent aggregation in a UML diagram, so here it is attached. Name: Roassal-BenComan.364 Ancestors: Roassal-AlexandreBergel.363, Roassal-BenComan.353 Merge addition of ROLineEndDiamond and ROMondrianExample>>umlAggregateOn: into mainline (though actually it more catching up ready to merge into mainline). Though upon further consideration perhaps 'LineEnd' is not proper, since someone might want to use it in the middle of a line. Perhaps better RODiamondLineShape or ROLineShapeDiamond or ROLSDiamond. btw, since there are many more symbols associated with lines than just arrows, perhaps consider renaming class ROAbstractArrow something like one of: ROAbstractLineEnd; ROAbstractLineSymbol; ROAbstractLineShape; ROLineShape.

1 4

Issue 856 in moose-technology: ROAbstractElement>>remove inconsistent nested behaviour
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Mar '13

03 Mar '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 856 by benjamin...(a)gmail.com: ROAbstractElement>>remove inconsistent nested behaviour http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=856 I would expect ROAbstractElement>>remove to work consistently whether it belongs to the top-level view or nested in another element. However it is not as demonstrate by the code below having this result... a ROElement<#x> ------ a ROElement<#x> a ROElement<#y> ========================================= v := ROView new. x := ROElement on: #x. y := ROElement on: #y. v add: x. v add: y. "this line different" y remove. v allElementsDo: [ :el | Transcript crShow: el ]. Transcript crShow: '------'. v := ROView new. x := ROElement on: #x. y := ROElement on: #y. v add: x. x add: y. "this line different" y remove. v allElementsDo: [ :el | Transcript crShow: el ].

1 2

Issue 852 in moose-technology: RORubberband with target highlighting
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Mar '13

03 Mar '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 852 by benjamin...(a)gmail.com: RORubberband with target highlighting http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=852 I have added highlighting of target elements to RORubberband - changeset attached. Note changeset is against Roassal-AlexandreBergel.343.mcz since .344 breaks something. Note2, I renamed RORubberbanding to RORubberband. I had originally been tossing up between the two, and under further consideration I think the latter is more appropriate. The former will need to be manually removed. Attachments: RubberBand2.3.cs 5.9 KB

1 8

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev October 2012