Parametrized Types
by Andre Hora
Hello,
I would like to use Parametrized Types in Moose to deal with (Java) code
like this: Map<B,NamedEntity>, where B and NamedEntity are arguments of Map.
I didn't find anything in the meta-model that allows me to represent that
structure.
What is the best way to have this in the meta-model? Create a
parametrizedTypes property in FAMIXClass?
Thanks!
--
Andre Hora
12 years, 4 months
Glamour Mondrian panel updateOn:from: bug
by Johan Fabry
Hi Doru, all
I am having a problem with the Mondrian panel in AspectMaps using an updateOn:from:. (See code below for details of the glamour script) I saw that on each update the update progressively gets slower. About double the time to be exact. I added some debugging code to the visualization to check this and ... on each update the mondrian drawing is painted double the amount of time than before: 1, 2, 4, 8, ... Poking around in the debugger shows the old pane is indeed not removed from the subscriptions list leading to doubling the amount of panes in the list on each refresh.
I suppose there is a simple fix for this so if you could fix it I would very much appreciate it! :-)
mondrianPaneOn: browser
|num|
num :=0.
browser transmit to: #mpanel; from: #models; andShow: [:a |
a mondrian
painting: [:view :model |
Transcript show: '+'.
model isNil ifFalse: [ <DO THE PAINTING>]].
Transcript show: num; cr. num := num + 1];
updateOn: AMModelChanged from: [:ent | self announcer ];
allowNil ].
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
12 years, 4 months
no type info for Java attributes?
by Johan Fabry
Hi all,
I just noticed that .mse files generated by intooitus do not seem to contain the declared types for the instance variables of the class :-( I can't find it in the moose model nor in the .mse file itself. Am I right or am I looking in the wrong place? Does VerveineJ include this info?
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
12 years, 4 months
a bug in Glamour
by Esteban Lorenzano
Hi,
I noticed that in some complex updating between panels, using an external announcer, some of the update subscriptions were not removed when the browser is closed. I debugged a little and I founded that this implementation:
GLMUpdateAction>>unregisterFromAllAnnouncements
announcerObjects ifNotNil: [
announcerObjects do: [:each |
each unsubscribe: self ] ]
is bugged, because if announcerObjects are not previously computed (and in some cases that's what happens), the subscription is not removed.
This implementation (just using the accessor instead the direct object), solves the problem (but I don't know is it's a right fix, and it should be a fix in other place)
GLMUpdateAction>>unregisterFromAllAnnouncements
self announcerObjects ifNotNil: [ :objects |
objects do: [:each |
each unsubscribe: self ] ]
Cheers,
Esteban
12 years, 4 months
moosejee hudson build
by Tudor Girba
Hi Fabrizio,
I created a hudson build specific for MooseJEE. There are only 11 failing tests :)
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Presenting is storytelling."
12 years, 4 months
Issue 488 in moose-technology: ConfigurationOfPetitParser should stay in its own repo
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com
Status: New
Owner: alexandre.bergel
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 488 by alexandre.bergel: ConfigurationOfPetitParser should stay
in its own repo
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=488
For some reason, ConfigurationOfPetitParser was contained in the Moose
repository.
There should be only one config. However, I would like to see Moose working
on Pharo 1.1.1 before doing some refactoring.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 3 Dec 2010, at 12:45, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Alex,
I see that you are working on the Moose release. That is great!
Just a note: The ConfigurationOfPetitParser should remain in the repository
of Lukas, and not in the repository of Moose. Could you take care of that?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
12 years, 4 months
Moose properties rationale pub?
by Johan Fabry
Hi all,
still looking for stuff: Is there a rationale written down for the moose properties mechanism? I'm using it, I like it, but I'd like to know (and cite) why it was originally implemented.
Thanks in advance!
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
12 years, 4 months
What's a sensible definition of FAMIXMethod>>incomingAccesses?
by Simon Denier
Take a look at the following definitions:
FAMIXClass>>qIncomingAccesses
^ self attributes flatCollect: [ :each | each incomingAccesses ]
FAMIXScopingEntity>>qIncomingAccesses "Package, Namespace"
^ self classes flatCollect: [ :c | c qIncomingAccesses ]
Now does it make sense to have a similar definition for FAMIXMethod?
FAMIXMethod>>qIncomingAccesses
^ (self parameters collect: #incomingAccesses)
addAll: (self localVariables collect: #incomingAccesses);
yourself
We can't really say there are 'incoming accesses' on attributes in a method. On the contrary, methods are the ones which make (outgoing) accesses to attributes. On the other hand, incoming accesses on parameters and local variables are necessarily from the lexical scope, the method itself: so not a very interesting information. And it's not consistent with the FamixClass and FamixScopingEntity, which collect all access to attributes within their scope.
In other words, we can say:
aClass qIncomingInvocaions = aClass methods flatCollect: #qIncomingInvocations
but:
aClass qIncomingAccesses ~= aClass methods flatCollect: #qIncomingAccesses
I am wondering if it would not be better to just say:
FAMIXMethod>>qIncomingAccesses
^ Array new
Or maybe I'm just trying to split hairs
--
Simon
12 years, 4 months
What feature you want to see in Mondrian
by Alexandre Bergel
Hi!
I am willing to spend some time on Mondrian the coming weeks. I would like to know what are the feature/issue what are the most pressing for you?
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/list?can=2&q=Mondrian&co...
Lazy edges?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
12 years, 4 months
