Hi
someone pointed to the KDM metamodel. Could be relevant for us :) Software Modernisation Metamodel
http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/07-03-15.pdf
stef
I attended a tutorial on that at WCRE in Pittsburgh, and after my experience with MOF/EMOF I will never again adopt an OMG standard, they are usually incomplete and obfuscated snapshots of Rational's current implementation mess... we better stick to properly documenting our implementation mess :)
<model xmi:id="id.156" xmi:type="conceptual:ConceptualModel" name="Customer Information"> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.157" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AccountBalance" implementation="id.15 id.12 id.17 id.153"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.158" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="MaxAdjustedBalance" implementation="id.106"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.159" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AllowanceAmount" implementation="id.71"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.160" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="Allowance" implementation="id.20"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.161" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AdjustedBalance" implementation="id.18"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.162" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AccountBalanceField" implementation="id.153"/>
Can we order new harddisks to store those models? ^^
AA
On 8 Dec 2007, at 10:06 , stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
someone pointed to the KDM metamodel. Could be relevant for us :) Software Modernisation Metamodel
http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/07-03-15.pdf
stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
;)
I got the same with XMI spec... :) Stef
On 8 déc. 07, at 11:17, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
I attended a tutorial on that at WCRE in Pittsburgh, and after my experience with MOF/EMOF I will never again adopt an OMG standard, they are usually incomplete and obfuscated snapshots of Rational's current implementation mess... we better stick to properly documenting our implementation mess :)
<model xmi:id="id.156" xmi:type="conceptual:ConceptualModel" name="Customer Information"> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.157" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AccountBalance" implementation="id.15 id.12 id.17 id.153"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.158" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="MaxAdjustedBalance" implementation="id.106"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.159" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AllowanceAmount" implementation="id.71"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.160" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="Allowance" implementation="id.20"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.161" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AdjustedBalance" implementation="id.18"/> <conceptualElement xmi:id="id.162" xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AccountBalanceField" implementation="id.153"/>
Can we order new harddisks to store those models? ^^
:) But we have better data to store :)
It was fun to see that they want to represent control flow constructs.
stef