8 Dec
2007
8 Dec
'07
10:06 a.m.
Hi
someone pointed to the KDM metamodel. Could be relevant for us :)
Software Modernisation Metamodel
http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/07-03-15.pdf
stef
8 Dec
8 Dec
11:17 a.m.
I attended a tutorial on that at WCRE in Pittsburgh, and after my
experience with MOF/EMOF I will never again adopt an OMG standard,
they are usually incomplete and obfuscated snapshots of Rational's
current implementation mess... we better stick to properly
documenting our implementation mess :)
<model xmi:id="id.156"
xmi:type="conceptual:ConceptualModel"
name="Customer Information">
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.157"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AccountBalance"
implementation="id.15 id.12 id.17 id.153"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.158"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="MaxAdjustedBalance"
implementation="id.106"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.159"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AllowanceAmount"
implementation="id.71"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.160"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="Allowance"
implementation="id.20"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.161"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AdjustedBalance"
implementation="id.18"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.162"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AccountBalanceField"
implementation="id.153"/>
Can we order new harddisks to store those models? ^^
AA
On 8 Dec 2007, at 10:06 , stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
someone pointed to the KDM metamodel. Could be relevant for us :)
Software Modernisation Metamodel
http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/07-03-15.pdf
stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
1:46 p.m.
;)
I got the same with XMI spec... :)
Stef
On 8 déc. 07, at 11:17, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
I attended a tutorial on that at WCRE in Pittsburgh,
and after my
experience with MOF/EMOF I will never again adopt an OMG standard,
they are usually incomplete and obfuscated snapshots of Rational's
current implementation mess... we better stick to properly
documenting our implementation mess :)
:)
But we have better data to store :)
It was fun to see that they want to represent control flow constructs.
stef
<model xmi:id="id.156"
xmi:type="conceptual:ConceptualModel"
name="Customer Information">
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.157"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AccountBalance"
implementation="id.15 id.12 id.17 id.153"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.158"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="MaxAdjustedBalance"
implementation="id.106"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.159"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AllowanceAmount"
implementation="id.71"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.160"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="Allowance"
implementation="id.20"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.161"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AdjustedBalance"
implementation="id.18"/>
<conceptualElement xmi:id="id.162"
xmi:type="conceptual:TermUnit" name="AccountBalanceField"
implementation="id.153"/>
Can we order new harddisks to store those models? ^^
6006
days inactive
6006
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Adrian Kuhn -
stephane ducasse -
Stéphane Ducasse