When you have a antrl grammar, smacc is really nice.
Le 14/8/16 à 22:31, Tudor Girba a écrit :
PetitParser is a dynamic parser. SmaCC is a static parser. Both have their usages, and
the static parsers are significantly faster. The speed problem of PetitParser will likely
be significantly improved once we get the work of Jan on compiling parsers.
One thing that SmaCC comes with is an extensive library of parsers and ASTs (e.g.,
> On Aug 14, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
> Thanks Doru.
> Just wondering, I always had in mind that PetitParser is a kind of ultimate framework
for parsing. Why would one want to use SmaCC if PetitParser is so robust and popular?
>> On Aug 12, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>> John Brant created a repo on SmalltalkHub with the latest version of SmaCC.
>> And now, SmaCC is part of Moose 6.0.
>> "Value is always contextual."
>> Moose-dev mailing list
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> Moose-dev mailing list
"Problem solving efficiency grows with the abstractness level of problem
Moose-dev mailing list