4 Sep
2008
4 Sep
'08
10:27 a.m.
Hi,
| class |
class := FAMIXClass new.
class name: 'AClass'.
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'aMethod'; yourself).
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'anotherMethod'; yourself).
(class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [:p | p name ==
#methods]) getFrom: class
The following code returns:
an Array(an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod))
Shouldn't it be instead?:
an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
4 Sep
4 Sep
10:59 a.m.
Hmm,
Something is funny here. I have to take a closer look.
Cheers,
Doru
On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi,
| class |
class := FAMIXClass new.
class name: 'AClass'.
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'aMethod'; yourself).
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'anotherMethod';
yourself).
(class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [:p | p name ==
#methods]) getFrom: class
The following code returns:
an Array(an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod))
Shouldn't it be instead?:
an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
12:41 p.m.
I guess the bug is due to the new contract of #getFrom: and
#setOn:values: that treats all properties as if multivalued. Before
those methods called the bare selectors, that is, worked diff for
single- and multivalued properties.
cheers,
AA
On 4 Sep 2008, at 10:59 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Hmm,
Something is funny here. I have to take a closer look.
Cheers,
Doru
On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi,
| class |
class := FAMIXClass new.
class name: 'AClass'.
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'aMethod'; yourself).
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'anotherMethod';
yourself).
(class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [:p | p name ==
#methods]) getFrom: class
The following code returns:
an Array(an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod))
Shouldn't it be instead?:
an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it." 
12:48 p.m.
I guess the bug is due to the new contract of
#getFrom: and
#setOn:values: that treats all properties as if multivalued. Before
those methods called the bare selectors, that is, worked diff for
single- and multivalued properties.
How can:
(class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [:p | p name ==
#methods]) getFrom: class
return a collection of FAMIXMethods ?
Is there a new way to get values from a property?
Adrian, can you have a look at it please?
Cheers,
Alexandre
cheers,
AA
On 4 Sep 2008, at 10:59 , Tudor Girba wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hmm,
Something is funny here. I have to take a closer look.
Cheers,
Doru
On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
| class |
class := FAMIXClass new.
class name: 'AClass'.
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'aMethod'; yourself).
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'anotherMethod';
yourself).
(class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [:p | p name ==
#methods]) getFrom: class
The following code returns:
an Array(an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod))
Shouldn't it be instead?:
an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
3:40 p.m.
I can take a look.
Do you have a test case that reproduces the error? If yes, which
packages do I have to checkout and which test to run? Or even better,
just upload me an image somewhere with an open debugger.
PS ... you can use #attributeNamed:
(class mooseDescription attributeNamed: #methods) getFrom: class
cheers,
AA
I guess the bug is due to the new contract of
#getFrom: and
#setOn:values: that treats all properties as if multivalued. Before
those methods called the bare selectors, that is, worked diff for
single- and multivalued properties.
How can:
(class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [:p | p name ==
#methods]) getFrom: class
return a collection of FAMIXMethods ?
Is there a new way to get values from a property?
Adrian, can you have a look at it please?
Cheers,
Alexandre
cheers,
AA
On 4 Sep 2008, at 10:59 , Tudor Girba wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hmm,
Something is funny here. I have to take a closer look.
Cheers,
Doru
On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev at iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
| class |
class := FAMIXClass new.
class name: 'AClass'.
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'aMethod'; yourself).
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'anotherMethod';
yourself).
(class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [:p | p name ==
#methods]) getFrom: class
The following code returns:
an Array(an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod))
Shouldn't it be instead?:
an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev at iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
3:56 p.m.
An image is available on http://www.bergel.eu/MooseSqueak.zip
Just evaluate the following in a workspace:
| class |
class := FAMIXClass new.
class name: 'AClass'.
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'aMethod'; yourself).
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'anotherMethod'; yourself).
(class mooseDescription attributeNamed: #methods)
getFrom: class
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 4 Sep 2008, at 15:40, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
I can take a look.
Do you have a test case that reproduces the error? If yes, which
packages do I have to checkout and which test to run? Or even better,
just upload me an image somewhere with an open debugger.
PS ... you can use #attributeNamed:
(class mooseDescription attributeNamed: #methods) getFrom: class
cheers,
AA
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
I guess the bug is due to the new contract of
#getFrom: and
#setOn:values: that treats all properties as if multivalued. Before
those methods called the bare selectors, that is, worked diff for
single- and multivalued properties.
How can:
(class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [:p | p name ==
#methods]) getFrom: class
return a collection of FAMIXMethods ?
Is there a new way to get values from a property?
Adrian, can you have a look at it please?
Cheers,
Alexandre
cheers,
AA
On 4 Sep 2008, at 10:59 , Tudor Girba wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hmm,
Something is funny here. I have to take a closer look.
Cheers,
Doru
On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev at iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
| class |
class := FAMIXClass new.
class name: 'AClass'.
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'aMethod'; yourself).
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'anotherMethod';
yourself).
(class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [:p | p name ==
#methods]) getFrom: class
The following code returns:
an Array(an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod))
Shouldn't it be instead?:
an OrderedCollection(a FAMIXMethod #aMethod a FAMIXMethod
#anotherMethod)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev at iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
6 Sep
6 Sep
8:03 p.m.
Hi Alex,
there is a typo in the pragmas of FAMIXClass >> #methods, replace
<mulivalued> with <multivalued> and then it works.
NB as it seems, Squeak does compile methods with unknown pragmas
where as WV throws an error if one uses an unknown pragma (which
typically happens because of a typo).
cheers,
AA
On 4 Sep 2008, at 15:15 , Alexandre Bergel wrote:
An image is available on
http://www.bergel.eu/MooseSqueak.zip
Just evaluate the following in a workspace:
| class |
class := FAMIXClass new.
class name: 'AClass'.
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'aMethod'; yourself).
class addToMethods: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'anotherMethod';
yourself).
(class mooseDescription attributeNamed: #methods)
getFrom: class
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 4 Sep 2008, at 15:40, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
I can take a look.
Do you have a test case that reproduces the error? If yes, which
packages do I have to checkout and which test to run? Or even
better,
> just upload me an image somewhere with an open debugger.
>
> PS ... you can use #attributeNamed:
>
> (class mooseDescription attributeNamed: #methods) getFrom: class
>
> cheers,
> AA 
8:54 p.m.
NB as it seems, Squeak does compile methods with
unknown pragmas
where as WV throws an error if one uses an unknown pragma (which
typically happens because of a typo).
Yes, Squeak does not require pragmas to be declared. The compiler
however throws a notification if you use an unknown selector and
offers you to change it, similar to what it does when you use an
unknown message send within normal code. In my opinion this is much
more Smalltalk like than requiring a static declaration of pragmas.
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
5705
days inactive
5707
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Adrian Kuhn -
Alexandre Bergel -
Bergel, Alexandre -
Lukas Renggli -
Tudor Girba