26 Jan
2011
26 Jan
'11
6:41 p.m.
Hi,
While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose
interface on the web), we thought about putting a few basic/common
visualization queries on the web. These queries will allow users to have an
understanding of their system without trying different combinations of
elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of
visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take
a feedback from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations
they find useful for a potential user of the system.
Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be
useful for a user for his/her system?
thanx
Usman
Post-Doc at RMoD Team
26 Jan
26 Jan
8:50 p.m.
The idea is
what are the three scenario that we could put by default.
We were thinking about a dashboard at package level.
Stef
On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Hi,
While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose interface on the
web), we thought about putting a few basic/common visualization queries on the web. These
queries will allow users to have an understanding of their system without trying different
combinations of elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of
visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take a feedback
from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations they find useful for a
potential user of the system.
Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a
user for his/her system?
thanx
Usman
Post-Doc at RMoD Team
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:30 p.m.
Can you please provide a list of three visualizations
that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system?
The visualization I personally often use are:
- Distribution map
- Test blueprint (the one from Hapao)
- Ad-hoc visualization that shows me the package dependencies
There is a SVG exporter for Mondrian, it may be useful for your project.
Post-Doc at RMoD Team
You do a postdoc with Stef, cool!
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
9:47 p.m.
On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
with what?
Can you please
provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a user for his/her
system?
The visualization I personally often use are:
- Distribution map - Test blueprint (the one from Hapao)
- Ad-hoc visualization that shows me the package dependencies
There is a SVG exporter for Mondrian, it may be useful for your project.
Post-Doc at RMoD Team
You do a postdoc with Stef, cool!
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:32 p.m.
Can you please provide a list of three visualizations
that you think can be useful for a user for his/her system?
The visualization I personally often use are:
- Distribution map - Test blueprint (the one from Hapao)
- Ad-hoc visualization that shows me the package dependencies
There is a SVG exporter for Mondrian, it may be useful for your project.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Post-Doc at RMoD Team
You do a postdoc with Stef, cool!
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
27 Jan
27 Jan
12:10 a.m.
- an intuitive layer-based viz (layertable is nice but not intuitive, a bit like
cycletable)
Would be nice to have that for Menssana too
On 26 janv. 2011, at 18:41, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Hi,
While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose interface on the
web), we thought about putting a few basic/common visualization queries on the web. These
queries will allow users to have an understanding of their system without trying different
combinations of elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of
visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take a feedback
from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations they find useful for a
potential user of the system.
Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a
user for his/her system?
thanx
Usman
Post-Doc at RMoD Team
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
4:58 p.m.
I think that some of the ideas of AspectMaps could be backported to the polymetric views
visualization: dynamically selecting the metrics for width and height, and having a
structural zoom on the contents of the classes. See the screencast
http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_struct_zoom to see what the latter means.
For an idea of how nice the former is to work with, see
http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_ui at about the 3:30 mark ...
On 26 Jan 2011, at 20:10, Simon Denier wrote:
- an intuitive layer-based viz (layertable is nice but not intuitive, a bit like
cycletable)
Would be nice to have that for Menssana too
On 26 janv. 2011, at 18:41, Usman Bhatti wrote:
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
Hi,
While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose interface on the
web), we thought about putting a few basic/common visualization queries on the web. These
queries will allow users to have an understanding of their system without trying different
combinations of elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of
visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take a feedback
from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations they find useful for a
potential user of the system.
Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a
user for his/her system?
thanx
Usman
Post-Doc at RMoD Team
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
5:04 p.m.
For the customizable system complexity, there already is a browser in:
FAMIXClassGroup>>viewSystemComplexityInWizard
or from the menu:
ClassGroup / Visualize / Customizable System Compexity
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 Jan 2011, at 16:58, Johan Fabry wrote:
I think that some of the ideas of AspectMaps could be backported to the polymetric views
visualization: dynamically selecting the metrics for width and height, and having a
structural zoom on the contents of the classes. See the screencast
http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_struct_zoom to see what the latter means.
For an idea of how nice the former is to work with, see
http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_ui at about the 3:30 mark ...
On 26 Jan 2011, at 20:10, Simon Denier wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair,
you will end up with a messy haircut."
- an intuitive layer-based viz (layertable is nice but not intuitive, a bit like
cycletable)
Would be nice to have that for Menssana too
On 26 janv. 2011, at 18:41, Usman Bhatti wrote:
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
While brainstorming the project Moose-on-the-Web (providing a moose interface on the
web), we thought about putting a few basic/common visualization queries on the web. These
queries will allow users to have an understanding of their system without trying different
combinations of elements (packages, class, methods, etc.) and different combinations of
visualizations (UML diagram, class blue-print, etc.). So, we thought to take a feedback
from the people on this list regarding the common visualizations they find useful for a
potential user of the system.
Can you please provide a list of three visualizations that you think can be useful for a
user for his/her system?
thanx
Usman
Post-Doc at RMoD Team
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon Denier
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5:54 p.m.
OK so you just need to add the structural zoom to that :-)
On 27 Jan 2011, at 13:04, Tudor Girba wrote:
For the customizable system complexity, there already
is a browser in:
FAMIXClassGroup>>viewSystemComplexityInWizard
or from the menu:
ClassGroup / Visualize / Customizable System Compexity
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 Jan 2011, at 16:58, Johan Fabry wrote:
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
I think that some of the ideas of AspectMaps could be backported to the polymetric views
visualization: dynamically selecting the metrics for width and height, and having a
structural zoom on the contents of the classes. See the screencast
http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_struct_zoom to see what the latter means.
For an idea of how nice the former is to work with, see
http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_ui at about the 3:30 mark ...
13 Feb
13 Feb
4:07 p.m.
What the system complexity offers is a blueprint of the class where the mouse if waving
upon.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 27 Jan 2011, at 13:54, Johan Fabry wrote:
OK so you just need to add the structural zoom to that :-)
On 27 Jan 2011, at 13:04, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
For the customizable system complexity, there
already is a browser in:
FAMIXClassGroup>>viewSystemComplexityInWizard
or from the menu:
ClassGroup / Visualize / Customizable System Compexity
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 Jan 2011, at 16:58, Johan Fabry wrote:
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I think that some of the ideas of AspectMaps could be backported to the polymetric views
visualization: dynamically selecting the metrics for width and height, and having a
structural zoom on the contents of the classes. See the screencast
http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_struct_zoom to see what the latter means.
For an idea of how nice the former is to work with, see
http://pleiad.cl/research/software/aspectmaps_ui at about the 3:30 mark ...
4831
days inactive
4849
days old
9 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Johan Fabry -
Simon Denier -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba -
Usman Bhatti