Thanks. Of course, an MIT would have been probably more straightforward especially for the integration in Pharo, but I guess it should do for now.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:57, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Fixed, picked the WTFPL license.
--AA
On Nov 10, 2009, at 23:10 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Adrian,
It looks like the latest versions of Fame depend on PhExample. Unfortunately, PhExample is not released under a MIT/BSD-compatible license.
Is there a mistake somewhere, or should Moose go with a fork of Fame?
Cheers, Doru
On 10 Nov 2009, at 22:43, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
Apparently changes in Fame broke moose.
processCompiledMethod: aMethod | pragma prop |
aMethod should be isCompiledMethod.
pragma := Pragma inMethod: aMethod
So what do we do?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
WTFPL is fully compatible with MIT and whatever else lawyers might come up with ... as should be obvious from WTF's very name :)
--AA
On Nov 11, 2009, at 15:11 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Thanks. Of course, an MIT would have been probably more straightforward especially for the integration in Pharo, but I guess it should do for now.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:57, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Fixed, picked the WTFPL license.
--AA
On Nov 10, 2009, at 23:10 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Adrian,
It looks like the latest versions of Fame depend on PhExample. Unfortunately, PhExample is not released under a MIT/BSD- compatible license.
Is there a mistake somewhere, or should Moose go with a fork of Fame?
Cheers, Doru
On 10 Nov 2009, at 22:43, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
Apparently changes in Fame broke moose.
processCompiledMethod: aMethod | pragma prop |
> aMethod should be isCompiledMethod.
pragma := Pragma inMethod: aMethod
So what do we do?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
I know it is compatible, but I think Pharo would like all code to be under MIT.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 15:30, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
WTFPL is fully compatible with MIT and whatever else lawyers might come up with ... as should be obvious from WTF's very name :)
--AA
On Nov 11, 2009, at 15:11 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Thanks. Of course, an MIT would have been probably more straightforward especially for the integration in Pharo, but I guess it should do for now.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:57, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Fixed, picked the WTFPL license.
--AA
On Nov 10, 2009, at 23:10 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Adrian,
It looks like the latest versions of Fame depend on PhExample. Unfortunately, PhExample is not released under a MIT/BSD- compatible license.
Is there a mistake somewhere, or should Moose go with a fork of Fame?
Cheers, Doru
On 10 Nov 2009, at 22:43, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
Apparently changes in Fame broke moose.
processCompiledMethod: aMethod | pragma prop |
>> aMethod should be isCompiledMethod.
pragma := Pragma inMethod: aMethod
So what do we do?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
Does it mean we have to load Phexample now?
Or maybe we can use metacello to load a fixed version of Fame while Adrian experiments with Phexample :)
On 11 nov. 2009, at 11:30, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
WTFPL is fully compatible with MIT and whatever else lawyers might come up with ... as should be obvious from WTF's very name :)
--AA
On Nov 11, 2009, at 15:11 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Thanks. Of course, an MIT would have been probably more straightforward especially for the integration in Pharo, but I guess it should do for now.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:57, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Fixed, picked the WTFPL license.
--AA
On Nov 10, 2009, at 23:10 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Adrian,
It looks like the latest versions of Fame depend on PhExample. Unfortunately, PhExample is not released under a MIT/BSD- compatible license.
Is there a mistake somewhere, or should Moose go with a fork of Fame?
Cheers, Doru
On 10 Nov 2009, at 22:43, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
Apparently changes in Fame broke moose.
processCompiledMethod: aMethod | pragma prop |
>> aMethod should be isCompiledMethod.
pragma := Pragma inMethod: aMethod
So what do we do?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Simon
Phexample should be pretty stable. I will extend Metacello to use that.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 15:48, Simon Denier wrote:
Does it mean we have to load Phexample now?
Or maybe we can use metacello to load a fixed version of Fame while Adrian experiments with Phexample :)
On 11 nov. 2009, at 11:30, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
WTFPL is fully compatible with MIT and whatever else lawyers might come up with ... as should be obvious from WTF's very name :)
--AA
On Nov 11, 2009, at 15:11 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Thanks. Of course, an MIT would have been probably more straightforward especially for the integration in Pharo, but I guess it should do for now.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:57, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Fixed, picked the WTFPL license.
--AA
On Nov 10, 2009, at 23:10 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Adrian,
It looks like the latest versions of Fame depend on PhExample. Unfortunately, PhExample is not released under a MIT/BSD- compatible license.
Is there a mistake somewhere, or should Moose go with a fork of Fame?
Cheers, Doru
On 10 Nov 2009, at 22:43, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
Apparently changes in Fame broke moose.
processCompiledMethod: aMethod | pragma prop | >>> aMethod should be isCompiledMethod. pragma := Pragma inMethod: aMethod
So what do we do?
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
What do you mean by that?
Stef On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Phexample should be pretty stable. I will extend Metacello to use that.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 15:48, Simon Denier wrote:
Does it mean we have to load Phexample now?
Or maybe we can use metacello to load a fixed version of Fame while Adrian experiments with Phexample :)
On 11 nov. 2009, at 11:30, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
WTFPL is fully compatible with MIT and whatever else lawyers might come up with ... as should be obvious from WTF's very name :)
--AA
On Nov 11, 2009, at 15:11 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Thanks. Of course, an MIT would have been probably more straightforward especially for the integration in Pharo, but I guess it should do for now.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:57, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Fixed, picked the WTFPL license.
--AA
On Nov 10, 2009, at 23:10 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Adrian,
It looks like the latest versions of Fame depend on PhExample. Unfortunately, PhExample is not released under a MIT/BSD-compatible license.
Is there a mistake somewhere, or should Moose go with a fork of Fame?
Cheers, Doru
On 10 Nov 2009, at 22:43, stephane ducasse wrote:
> Hi > > Apparently changes in Fame broke moose. > > processCompiledMethod: aMethod > | pragma prop | >>>> aMethod should be isCompiledMethod. > pragma := Pragma > inMethod: aMethod > > So what do we do? > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Sorry :).
I meant that I will extend the ConfigurationOfMoose to load Phexample so that we can load Fame. I hope I got it right this time :).
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 16:45, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
What do you mean by that?
Stef On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Phexample should be pretty stable. I will extend Metacello to use that.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 15:48, Simon Denier wrote:
Does it mean we have to load Phexample now?
Or maybe we can use metacello to load a fixed version of Fame while Adrian experiments with Phexample :)
On 11 nov. 2009, at 11:30, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
WTFPL is fully compatible with MIT and whatever else lawyers might come up with ... as should be obvious from WTF's very name :)
--AA
On Nov 11, 2009, at 15:11 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Thanks. Of course, an MIT would have been probably more straightforward especially for the integration in Pharo, but I guess it should do for now.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:57, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Fixed, picked the WTFPL license.
--AA
On Nov 10, 2009, at 23:10 , Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi Adrian, > > It looks like the latest versions of Fame depend on PhExample. > Unfortunately, PhExample is not released under a MIT/BSD- > compatible license. > > Is there a mistake somewhere, or should Moose go with a fork > of Fame? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 10 Nov 2009, at 22:43, stephane ducasse wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Apparently changes in Fame broke moose. >> >> processCompiledMethod: aMethod >> | pragma prop | >>>>> aMethod should be isCompiledMethod. >> pragma := Pragma >> inMethod: aMethod >> >> So what do we do? >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to > know her." > >
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
ok :)
Stef
On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Sorry :).
I meant that I will extend the ConfigurationOfMoose to load Phexample so that we can load Fame. I hope I got it right this time :).
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 16:45, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
What do you mean by that?
Stef On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Phexample should be pretty stable. I will extend Metacello to use that.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 15:48, Simon Denier wrote:
Does it mean we have to load Phexample now?
Or maybe we can use metacello to load a fixed version of Fame while Adrian experiments with Phexample :)
On 11 nov. 2009, at 11:30, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
WTFPL is fully compatible with MIT and whatever else lawyers might come up with ... as should be obvious from WTF's very name :)
--AA
On Nov 11, 2009, at 15:11 , Tudor Girba wrote:
Thanks. Of course, an MIT would have been probably more straightforward especially for the integration in Pharo, but I guess it should do for now.
Cheers, Doru
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:57, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
> Fixed, picked the WTFPL license. > > --AA > > On Nov 10, 2009, at 23:10 , Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi Adrian, >> >> It looks like the latest versions of Fame depend on PhExample. Unfortunately, PhExample is not released under a MIT/BSD-compatible license. >> >> Is there a mistake somewhere, or should Moose go with a fork of Fame? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> On 10 Nov 2009, at 22:43, stephane ducasse wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Apparently changes in Fame broke moose. >>> >>> processCompiledMethod: aMethod >>> | pragma prop | >>>>>> aMethod should be isCompiledMethod. >>> pragma := Pragma >>> inMethod: aMethod >>> >>> So what do we do? >>> >>> Stef >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her." >> >> >
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Doru
I think that adrian is confusing linking of tests (to avoid duplication of code - and potentially I like the idea) with assert based on a not so great dsl should be isCompiledMethod
I do not think that it scales imagine
arg should be isMushroom
So I would prefer that FAME does not use this kind of expressions which looks to me like an experiment. Now if we want to use the part of PhExample which allows us to compose tests why not. We could gain in avoiding redundancy in tests.
Stef
-
Adrian Kuhn -
Simon Denier -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba