17 Jun
2015
17 Jun
'15
2:48 p.m.
Hi,
It would be nice if the moose5.1 (https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/) image has no
failing tests.
2 tests are failing :
>><javascript:showStackTrace('test-GT.Tests.Spotter.GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest.testEachProcessor','GT.Tests.Spotter/GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest/testEachProcessor//summary')>
GT.Tests.Spotter.GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest.testEachProcessor<https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/GT.Tests.Spotter/GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest/testEachProcessor/>
1 mn 43 s
44<https://ci.inria.fr/moose/>
>><javascript:showStackTrace('test-GT.Tests.Inspector.GTInspectorExamplesTest.testAllExamples','GT.Tests.Inspector/GTInspectorExamplesTest/testAllExamples//summary')>
GT.Tests.Inspector.GTInspectorExamplesTest.testAllExamples<https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/GT.Tests.Inspector/GTInspectorExamplesTest/testAllExamples/>
10 mn
45<https://ci.inria.fr/moose/>
The second has a duration of 10mins which is very long. Does it mandatory do run it and
does it possible to split it ?
A way to solve them is to change in RTGrapherExample>>exampleSeismDepthAndMag and
exampleSeisms, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v0.1/summary/2.5_month.csv by
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/summary/2.5_month.csv
But as it is in Roassal repo I cannot commit it... and one will have to change the
configuration of Moose5.1...
By the way, does the GT* tests can be done in a GT job, e.g.:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit5 or https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit/?
Cheers,
Vincent
________________________________
Ce message et les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et r?serv?s ? l'usage exclusif de
ses destinataires. Il peut ?galement ?tre prot?g? par le secret professionnel. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir imm?diatement l'exp?diteur et de
le d?truire. L'int?grit? du message ne pouvant ?tre assur?e sur Internet, la
responsabilit? de Worldline ne pourra ?tre recherch?e quant au contenu de ce message. Bien
que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout
virus, l'exp?diteur ne donne aucune garantie ? cet ?gard et sa responsabilit? ne
saurait ?tre recherch?e pour tout dommage r?sultant d'un virus transmis.
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the
addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify
the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet,
the Worldline liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender
endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that
this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any
virus transmitted.
17 Jun
17 Jun
2:56 p.m.
Hi.
The GT tests are generic tests that work on customizations that are built
on top of GT. Thus, they have to run in the Moose job.
Indeed, perhaps some examples could be ignored for the purpose of tests. We
will certainly have something for this in GT5 for Moose 6/Pharo 5.
Moose 5.1 has only GT. GT 5 is made for Moose 6/Pharo 5 and it is not yet
ready for any public consumption.
Cheers,
Doru
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Blondeau Vincent <
vincent.blondeau(a)worldline.com> wrote:
Hi,
It would be nice if the moose5.1 (https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/)
image has no failing tests.
2 tests are failing :
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
>>
GT.Tests.Spotter.GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest.testEachProcessor
<https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/GT.Tests.Spotter/GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest/testEachProcessor/>
1 mn 43 s
44 <https://ci.inria.fr/moose/>
>>
GT.Tests.Inspector.GTInspectorExamplesTest.testAllExamples
<https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/GT.Tests.Inspector/GTInspectorExamplesTest/testAllExamples/>
10 mn
45 <https://ci.inria.fr/moose/>
The second has a duration of 10mins which is very long. Does it mandatory
do run it and does it possible to split it ?
A way to solve them is to change in
RTGrapherExample>>exampleSeismDepthAndMag and exampleSeisms,
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v0.1/summary/2.5_month.csv
by http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/summary/2.5_month.csv
But as it is in Roassal repo I cannot commit it… and one will have to
change the configuration of Moose5.1…
By the way, does the GT* tests can be done in a GT job, e.g.:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit5 or
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit/?
Cheers,
Vincent
------------------------------
Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage
exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret
professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir
immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne
pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité de Worldline ne pourra
être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs
efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout
virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa
responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un
virus transmis.
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As
its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability
cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours
to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that
this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages
resulting from any virus transmitted.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
19 Jun
19 Jun
1:02 a.m.
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago.
RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag
=> open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On Jun 17, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Blondeau Vincent
<vincent.blondeau(a)worldline.com> wrote:
Hi,
It would be nice if the moose5.1 (https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/) image has no
failing tests.
2 tests are failing :
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
GT.Tests.Spotter.GTSpotterProcessorsForExamplesTest.testEachProcessor
1 mn 43 s
44
>>
GT.Tests.Inspector.GTInspectorExamplesTest.testAllExamples
10 mn
45
The second has a duration of 10mins which is very long. Does it mandatory do run it and
does it possible to split it ?
A way to solve them is to change in RTGrapherExample>>exampleSeismDepthAndMag and
exampleSeisms, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v0.1/summary/2.5_month.csv
byhttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/summary/2.5_month.csv
But as it is in Roassal repo I cannot commit it… and one will have to change the
configuration of Moose5.1…
By the way, does the GT* tests can be done in a GT job, e.g.:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit5 orhttps://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit/?
Cheers,
Vincent
Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage exclusif de
ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret professionnel. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de
le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la
responsabilité de Worldline ne pourra être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien
que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout
virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne
saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the
addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify
the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet,
the Worldline liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender
endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that
this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any
virus transmitted.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
2:04 a.m.
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some
times ago.
RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag
=> open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is
version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is
from before the fix?
Stephan
2:53 p.m.
Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old release of Roassal2.
It should be fixed now I think
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan
<stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote:
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed
some times ago.
RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag
=> open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is
version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is
from before the fix?
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
1 Jul
1 Jul
3:17 p.m.
Hi Alexandre,
The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads
version 1.11 instead
of 12.1.
Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
Cheers,
Andrei
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
wrote:
Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old
release of Roassal2.
It should be fixed now I think
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote:
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago.
RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag
=> open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is
version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is
from before the fix?
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3 Jul
3 Jul
12:17 p.m.
I am not sure how to fix this.
Version 1.13, as you defined is suitable to be stable.
The last version of Roassal may be considered as stable.
Alexandre
On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Andrei Chis
<chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads version 1.11 instead of 12.1.
Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
Cheers,
Andrei
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old release of Roassal2.
It should be fixed now I think
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan
<stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote:
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev I do not understand. This problem has been fixed
some times ago.
RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag
=> open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is
version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is
from before the fix?
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
2:52 p.m.
Ok. I'll make again 1.13 as stable, only for Pharo 4, add see if I can fix
the moose5.1 build.
Cheers,
Andrei
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
wrote:
I am not sure how to fix this.
Version 1.13, as you defined is suitable to be stable.
The last version of Roassal may be considered as stable.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Andrei Chis
<chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads version 1.11
instead of
12.1.
Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
Cheers,
Andrei
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
wrote:
Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old
release of
Roassal2.
It should be fixed now I think
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>> I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago.
>> RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag
>> => open correctly in my image.
>>
>> Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on
6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is
version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is
from before the fix?
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3:43 p.m.
Okay!
Cheers,
Alexandre
On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Andrei Chis
<chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ok. I'll make again 1.13 as stable, only for Pharo 4, add see if I can fix the
moose5.1 build.
Cheers,
Andrei
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
I am not sure how to fix this.
Version 1.13, as you defined is suitable to be stable.
The last version of Roassal may be considered as stable.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Andrei Chis
<chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads version 1.11 instead of 12.1.
Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
Cheers,
Andrei
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
Well spotted.
I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old release of Roassal2.
It should be fixed now I think
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan
<stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote:
On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev I do not understand. This problem has been fixed
some times ago.
RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag
=> open correctly in my image.
Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on 6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is
version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is
from before the fix?
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
4:40 p.m.
I fixed version 1.13 to load in Pharo 4.
Now doing 'ConfigurationOfRoassal2 load' should work correctly in Pharo 4.
Also the moose 5.1 build is now green.
I would help not to change 1.13 from now on.
Cheers,
Andrei
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
wrote:
Okay!
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Andrei Chis
<chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Ok. I'll make again 1.13 as stable, only for Pharo 4, add see if I can
fix the
moose5.1 build.
Cheers,
Andrei
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
wrote:
I am not sure how to fix this.
Version 1.13, as you defined is suitable to be stable.
The last version of Roassal may be considered as stable.
Alexandre
> On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> The Moose 5.1 build is still failing.
>
> From what I see configuration of roassal2 now loads version 1.11
instead of
12.1.
>
> Do you still have problems with an older version of glamour?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andrei
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
> Well spotted.
>
> I have modified the configuration and produced a branch of that old
release
of Roassal2.
> It should be fixed now I think
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>> On Jun 18, 2015, at 9:04 PM, stephan <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19-06-15 01:02, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>> I do not understand. This problem has been fixed some times ago.
>>> RTGrapherExample new exampleSeismDepthAndMag
>>> => open correctly in my image.
>>>
>>> Why Moose 5.1 fails? Maybe we should just shutdown 5.1 and focus on
6.0.
Because the ConfigurationOfRoassal2 says that #stable for Pharo 4.x is
version1.12, which refers to Roassal2-AlexandreBergel.913 which is
from before the fix?
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3213
days inactive
3229
days old
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Andrei Chis -
Blondeau Vincent -
stephan -
Tudor Girba