13 Apr
2009
13 Apr
'09
10:45 a.m.
Dear All,
I would like to know how far are we from getting rid of FAMIX2 in the
Pharo version of Moose? FAMIX2 comprises 55 classes and 1084 methods.
I have never used any of these. Jannik, does DSM works on FAMIX3 ?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
16 Apr
16 Apr
11:26 a.m.
Hi Alex,
I would suggest to remove FAMIX2 from Moose-All, and just keep it in
the repository for other users.
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Apr 2009, at 10:45, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to know how far are we from getting rid of FAMIX2 in
the Pharo version of Moose? FAMIX2 comprises 55 classes and 1084
methods. I have never used any of these. Jannik, does DSM works on
FAMIX3 ?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
10 p.m.
Should be done. Was less automatic than expected.
Alexandre
On 16 Apr 2009, at 11:26, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Alex,
I would suggest to remove FAMIX2 from Moose-All, and just keep it in
the repository for other users.
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Apr 2009, at 10:45, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Dear All,
I would like to know how far are we from getting rid of FAMIX2 in
the Pharo version of Moose? FAMIX2 comprises 55 classes and 1084
methods. I have never used any of these. Jannik, does DSM works on
FAMIX3 ?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
10:23 p.m.
I do not understand your answer.
I think that this is important that FAMIX2.0 works well in sqMoose. so
that people can
smoothly port their code to sqMoose, so that we can check whether our
code extractor worked.
At the end we will just let it as an optional package.
Stef
On Apr 16, 2009, at 10:00 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Should be done. Was less automatic than expected.
Alexandre
On 16 Apr 2009, at 11:26, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Alex,
I would suggest to remove FAMIX2 from Moose-All, and just keep it
in the repository for other users.
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Apr 2009, at 10:45, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Dear All,
I would like to know how far are we from getting rid of FAMIX2 in
the Pharo version of Moose? FAMIX2 comprises 55 classes and 1084
methods. I have never used any of these. Jannik, does DSM works on
FAMIX3 ?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
11:29 p.m.
This is what was meant: to keep FAMIX2 as an optional package, but not
in the main Moose-All distribution.
Cheers,
Doru
On 16 Apr 2009, at 22:23, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I do not understand your answer.
I think that this is important that FAMIX2.0 works well in sqMoose.
so that people can
smoothly port their code to sqMoose, so that we can check whether
our code extractor worked.
At the end we will just let it as an optional package.
Stef
On Apr 16, 2009, at 10:00 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Problem solving should be concentrated on describing
the problem in a way that is relevant for the solution."
Should be done. Was less automatic than
expected.
Alexandre
On 16 Apr 2009, at 11:26, Tudor Girba wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi Alex,
I would suggest to remove FAMIX2 from Moose-All, and just keep it
in the repository for other users.
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Apr 2009, at 10:45, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Dear All,
I would like to know how far are we from getting rid of FAMIX2 in
the Pharo version of Moose? FAMIX2 comprises 55 classes and 1084
methods. I have never used any of these. Jannik, does DSM works
on FAMIX3 ?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
17 Apr
17 Apr
9:19 a.m.
And this is exactly what I did.
Alexandre
On 16 Apr 2009, at 23:29, Tudor Girba wrote:
This is what was meant: to keep FAMIX2 as an optional
package, but
not in the main Moose-All distribution.
Cheers,
Doru
On 16 Apr 2009, at 22:23, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
I do not understand your answer.
I think that this is important that FAMIX2.0 works well in sqMoose.
so that people can
smoothly port their code to sqMoose, so that we can check whether
our code extractor worked.
At the end we will just let it as an optional package.
Stef
On Apr 16, 2009, at 10:00 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Problem solving should be concentrated on describing
the problem in a way that is relevant for the solution."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Should be done. Was less automatic than
expected.
Alexandre
On 16 Apr 2009, at 11:26, Tudor Girba wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi Alex,
I would suggest to remove FAMIX2 from Moose-All, and just keep it
in the repository for other users.
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Apr 2009, at 10:45, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to know how far are we from getting rid of FAMIX2
> in the Pharo version of Moose? FAMIX2 comprises 55 classes and
> 1084 methods. I have never used any of these. Jannik, does DSM
> works on FAMIX3 ?
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
2:22 p.m.
That FAMIX2 is not part of Moose-All anymore. But it was not that
trivial to do.
I spent some time this morning with Jannik to make sure we do not
result in a screwed situation.
Alexandre
On 17 Apr 2009, at 12:11, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>> Should be done. Was less automatic
than expected.
but what this sentence means?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
10:19 p.m.
Ok but what were the problems?
Because normally only the tests and the famix20 importer should be
linked to famix2
Stef
On Apr 17, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
That FAMIX2 is not part of Moose-All anymore. But it
was not that
trivial to do.
I spent some time this morning with Jannik to make sure we do not
result in a screwed situation.
Alexandre
On 17 Apr 2009, at 12:11, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>> Should be done. Was less automatic
than expected.
but what this sentence means?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
18 Apr
18 Apr
7:51 a.m.
The problem was that almost all Moose tests were red if famix2 is not
present in memory. Some methods belonged to famix2 (e.g.,
CompiledMethod>>signature) while being used by famix3. Some classes as
well (e.g., MooseGroup).
I, with the help of Simon and Jannik, fixed this over the last few days.
Alexandre
On 17 Apr 2009, at 22:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Ok but what were the problems?
Because normally only the tests and the famix20 importer should be
linked to famix2
Stef
On Apr 17, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
That FAMIX2 is not part of Moose-All anymore. But
it was not that
trivial to do.
I spent some time this morning with Jannik to make sure we do not
result in a screwed situation.
Alexandre
On 17 Apr 2009, at 12:11, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Apr 17, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>> Should be done. Was less automatic
than expected.
but what this sentence means?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
11:29 a.m.
Ok I see.
did you move compiledMethod in Moose and not famix30?
Stef
On Apr 18, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
The problem was that almost all Moose tests were red
if famix2 is
not present in memory. Some methods belonged to famix2 (e.g.,
CompiledMethod>>signature) while being used by famix3. Some classes
as well (e.g., MooseGroup).
I, with the help of Simon and Jannik, fixed this over the last few
days.
Alexandre
On 17 Apr 2009, at 22:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Ok but what were the problems?
Because normally only the tests and the famix20 importer should be
linked to famix2
Stef
On Apr 17, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
That FAMIX2 is not part of Moose-All anymore. But
it was not that
trivial to do.
I spent some time this morning with Jannik to make sure we do not
result in a screwed situation.
Alexandre
On 17 Apr 2009, at 12:11, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On Apr 17, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>>> Should be done. Was less automatic than expected.
but what this sentence means?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
19 Apr
19 Apr
11:40 p.m.
In moose yes
Alexandre
On 18 Apr 2009, at 11:29, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Ok I see.
did you move compiledMethod in Moose and not famix30?
Stef
On Apr 18, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
The problem was that almost all Moose tests were
red if famix2 is
not present in memory. Some methods belonged to famix2 (e.g.,
CompiledMethod>>signature) while being used by famix3. Some classes
as well (e.g., MooseGroup).
I, with the help of Simon and Jannik, fixed this over the last few
days.
Alexandre
On 17 Apr 2009, at 22:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Ok but what were the problems?
Because normally only the tests and the famix20 importer should be
linked to famix2
Stef
On Apr 17, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
That FAMIX2 is not part of Moose-All anymore. But
it was not that
trivial to do.
I spent some time this morning with Jannik to make sure we do not
result in a screwed situation.
Alexandre
On 17 Apr 2009, at 12:11, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
>>>>> Should be done. Was less automatic than expected.
>
> but what this sentence means?
>
> Stef
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5488
days inactive
5494
days old
11 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Alexandre Bergel -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba