Comment #2 on issue 557 by vhane...(a)gmail.com: FAMIXComment wrongly initialized http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=557 Same thing for HismoCoChangePattern, FAMIXInvocation, FAMIXType and many other subclasses. This is now fixed in: - Famix-Core-VanessaPena.142 - Famix-Implementation-VanessaPena.78 - Famix-ManifestMf-VanessaPena.7 - Moose-Hismo-VanessaPena.37 - Moose-Tests-Core-VanessaPena.26

Comment #4 on issue 557 by vhane...(a)gmail.com: FAMIXComment wrongly initialized http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=557 Sorry if we (i.e., I and Alexandre) were a bit hasty on this. We were concerned with a proper initialization of famix classes. Would it be better to make printOn: not fail in case of a nil signature? Thanks for double checking what we have done.

Comment #6 on issue 557 by vhane...(a)gmail.com: FAMIXComment wrongly initialized http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=557 Hello, Can you check on MooseElement >> description as we have a test and it arises an error, please? Thanks. Cheers.

Comment #8 on issue 557 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: FAMIXComment wrongly initialized http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=557 I do not understand the meaning of MooseElement>>description and of testDescription. testDescription | element stream | element := MooseElement new. stream := WriteStream on: String new. self assert: (stream description isContainer). self assert: (stream description isKindOf: MAPriorityContainer). Actually, there is a problem with #description, because of Magritte which is loaded by Glamour. Magritte defines Object>>description and this returns a MagritteDescription. This conflicts with MooseEntity>>description which returns a string. So, the solution is to rename MooseEntity>>description to MooseEntity>>stringDescription or something like that, but this is a deep change and I would not do it now. In any case the above mentioned test is wrong in Moose-Tests-Core because it should not know about Magritte. So, I removed it.

Comment #10 on issue 557 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: FAMIXComment wrongly initialized http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=557 I also reworked a bit the MooseElementTests.