Would it make sense to move the contents presentation from FileReference to AbstractFileReference? I ask because I often use FileLocators, for which the presentation is not currently available.
Thanks! Sean
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/File-Presentation-Move-Up-tp4871359.html Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Bump :)
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
Would it make sense to move the contents presentation from FileReference to AbstractFileReference? I ask because I often use FileLocators, for which the presentation is not currently available.
Thanks! Sean
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/File-Presentation-Move-Up-tp4871359p4877619.html Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Sure. You just have to provide gt examples for AbstractFileReference to cover both a FileReference and a FileLocator (which is a bit odd). Could you give it a try?
Cheers, Doru
On Feb 15, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Sean P. DeNigris sean@clipperadams.com wrote:
Bump :)
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
Would it make sense to move the contents presentation from FileReference to AbstractFileReference? I ask because I often use FileLocators, for which the presentation is not currently available.
Thanks! Sean
Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/File-Presentation-Move-Up-tp4871359p4877619.html Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
-
Sean P. DeNigris -
Tudor Girba