The screenshot should be self explainable. I would love to have EyeSee
Cheers, Alexandre
but alex mondrian is about nodes and edges I really suggest that you do not bend it to make other stuff fit into it. Better start something else a library that you could use for mondrian and some other experiences
else it will always be clunky
Stef
On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
The screenshot should be self explainable. I would love to have EyeSee
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
<Screen shot 2010-06-04 at 17.35.10.png>_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I agree with this. I made this shape for a punctual need. We are currently experimenting differentiation of code profiling. We need to see the evolution of a metric for a particular program element (class, method or package). Maybe adding such a graph will help, maybe not.
Alexandre
On 7 Jun 2010, at 09:39, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
but alex mondrian is about nodes and edges I really suggest that you do not bend it to make other stuff fit into it. Better start something else a library that you could use for mondrian and some other experiences
else it will always be clunky
Stef
On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
The screenshot should be self explainable. I would love to have EyeSee
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
<Screen shot 2010-06-04 at 17.35.10.png>_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi,
The Shape hierarchy is supposed to be extended as a white-box framework.
However, indeed it would make sense to start investing in a broader framework. And yes, EyeSee is still on the to do list ... but it looks like it does not yet get to the top. If anyone wants to join, (s)he would be welcome :)
Doru
On 7 Jun 2010, at 15:48, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I agree with this. I made this shape for a punctual need. We are currently experimenting differentiation of code profiling. We need to see the evolution of a metric for a particular program element (class, method or package). Maybe adding such a graph will help, maybe not.
Alexandre
On 7 Jun 2010, at 09:39, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
but alex mondrian is about nodes and edges I really suggest that you do not bend it to make other stuff fit into it. Better start something else a library that you could use for mondrian and some other experiences
else it will always be clunky
Stef
On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
The screenshot should be self explainable. I would love to have EyeSee
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
<Screen shot 2010-06-04 at 17.35.10.png>_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"When people care, great things can happen."
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Alexandre Bergel -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba